Are you serious? Of course it does!Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
In any Legitimate court of law the accuser has to prove guilt. The accused only has to defend.
Printable View
Are you serious? Of course it does!Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
In any Legitimate court of law the accuser has to prove guilt. The accused only has to defend.
Not in BDunnell's world where it's only necessary to offend his sensibilities in order to be proven guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Here is what Muslim extremists want to do to innocent westerners. Please note, not the benign Muslims, just the bad ones.
Be fore-warned, these photos of the Bostom bombing are explicit and, for some, too disturbing to view.
Boston Bomb Blasts
I am sure that graphic photos of the damage done to civilians by American weapons in numerous conflicts would make equally unpleasant viewing (not that I have clicked on the link as I have no desire to see what are probably extremely intrusive pictures.)Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
I am referring to the fact that the accusations get investigated not solely by the accuser him/herself, but by the police.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
See my comment above.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
To think you used to be a moderator.
As BDunnell says there are no doubt graphic photo's of innocent Muslims caught up in conflicts to which they don't invite that tell an equally distressing story. As westerners we find it difficult to relate when its not happening in our own countries. The Boston bombing much like the London, and Madrid bombings was out of the ordinary so we tend to give it way more attention than say a suicide bombing in Baghdad that kills 100 or so innocent civilians who are also not Islamic extremists. I wouldn't condone terrorism on any countries soil, but we only seem to act or become outraged when it happens to us. The accidental deaths and collateral damage we cause abroad when carrying out our military strikes aren't as good for the voters here, but then there are groups who feel they have a duty to react. Terrorism isn't going away and if only we could actually come up with a proactive way of tackling it instead of inviting it with idiotic foreign policy.Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
In a criminal trial the State(Police and prosecutors) are the accusers. Don't they even pretend to have justice system over where you live? To keep people like you placated by saying how they are fair and unbiased.
Or worse.....Prove how she is wrong. In her reality that is a crime against humanity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
I wouldn't really mention Boston, London and Madrid in the same sentence... the Boston bombings were probably just the work of a couple of deranged kids with pressure cookers and gunpowder, as opposed to the more organised attacks in London and Madrid.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Otherwise I agree :)
'Her'? Is that a deliberate error?Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Yes, a fair point.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
I guess it's just "Big Tony" trolling. It appears to be confused about sexuality, along with all it's other issues. :dozey: :pQuote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I'm not a moderator anymore because I chose not to be one. In addition to more important reasons (to me), I was getting tired of being careful not to take sides. It's more fun playing in the sandbox with the crowd here.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
It is possible for people to step back from their own personal viewpoint and be fair. Judges all over the world do it every day. So do most moderators. I never dinged anyone for any positions they took (WHAT they said as opposed to HOW they said it). I DID for violations of forum policy like personal insults, profanity, threats, advertising, etc. You're just upset because you stepped over those lines a time or two and got called on it. Grow up.
Not at all. I wouldn't credit yourself with such ability to influence my emotions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
I just meant in the context of groups using religion as their cause regardless of whether they are amateur or professional terrorists. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
And did you come to that conclusion because you have actual facts to back it up or because it is convenient for your jealous hatred of the USA?Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Fair pointQuote:
Originally Posted by Starter
In what way is it left wing? I would genuinely like to know why you consider it was.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
I can't recall a time when radical Americans moved to a foreign country to terrorize innocent civilians on their home soil. Please enlighten me.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
whatever :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
I don't think that was the point being made.Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Do you have the facts to prove otherwise or is it simply convenient for your jealous hatred for Europe? Notice I used the lame unfounded accusation to try and add weight to my post regardless of how ineffective it is. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Amazing what the nutty gun sites pick up on:
Boston Marathon Bomb Packed with Gunpowder, Shrapnel | The Truth About GunsThe Truth About Guns
The 19 year old was American and his brother was from a satellite republic of the old Soviet Union.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
And, finally, there is no such country such as say, the Republic of Muslimia, Muslimland, Central Mulsim Republic of Outer Mongolia. :D
Your refusal to answer just confirms it. You have nothing to base that statement on except that it is convenient for your jealous hatred of the USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Isn't "nutty" We just haven't given up on our human rights like you have.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Donk doesn't hate the USA, he just doesn't like our plastic cutlery.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Are you going to answer my query about your use of 'her' in this statement?Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
It's my point. This is the unprovoked destruction radical Muslims want to inflict upon Westerners. They do not want to engage in diplomacy or anything that rings of honor and decency. These particular parasites came to this country, took advantage of our largesse (re: welfare system) to the tune of $100,000 (not including the $1600 the mom shoplifted before skipping the country to keep from being held accountable), knowing all the time that they detested this country and wanted to inflict harm upon it. Yet why do I get the feeling some Euros think it's justified?Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
You're way too impressed with yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I sincerely hope you are not accusing me of justifying terrorism with that last statement! I haven't seen anybody here even hint at that sort of thing so you might want to consider what you are writing here or at least read what others are saying more carefully. I'm appalled. Innocent people were killed for no reason and you think there are people on this board who think that is ok? Come on now.Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Haven't given up on all of them. I still have the unalienable right to fart in a lift, or to be reasonable when I want to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Self delusion? Paranoia? Who knows...Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
His refusal to answer just confirms it. He has nothing to base that statement on except that it is convenient for his jealous hatred of you.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I wasn't aware owning sporting goods was a human right lol. I own a cricket bat, does that count?Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
I think I've broken a rib!
Far from it. There are plenty of people to whose views I'm happy to defer. Right-wing, gun-toting Americans are not amongst them.Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Okay back to topic:
More arrests have taken place:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013...d-sources?lite
ImpossibleQuote:
Originally Posted by race aficionado
According to donKey jote the bombings were the work of
You mean that donKey jote based it's statement on something else besides information, evidence or logic? What else could donKey jote have based it's belief on?Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........I wonder............. :)
But apparently the inability to actually exercise it.Quote:
Originally Posted by donKey jote