Bachmann v perry-which one to beat obama?

http://blog.chron.com/rickperry/file...ul-600x394.jpg


Paul: "but Gore...."

Perry: "but Gore nothing. So what if I supported Gore in 1988. You have no idea what he promised me.....but since then, I have seen the light and the error of my prior wicked ways. And I am telling you, the money is better on this side..yes, sir.....


Actually this photo is really just two fellow Texans from Texas discussing their preferences for eyeliner.....



did I mention that Perry was totally behind Gore in 1988......(no pun intended)

Quote:

---

"I remember Rick Perry from that campaign. He was one of a number of Democratic legislators who endorsed my candidacy in 1988, and I was happy to have his support,” Gore said. “I don’t know what has happened to him since then.”

---

well, me neither, but my educated guess is it is green, just not the green that gore had in mind when he made his movie....



Al Gore says he was

It's just Texas politics. Personally I think we need less of it in the rest of the country these days.
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/2791/lbjkisses.jpg
Johnson was a pretty ruthless senator himself before becoming President.

The trick to success is finding a way to balance things out:
http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/1...andkennedy.jpg
The problem being there's no Republican that looks to have a chance of moderating the wackiness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gregor-y

The problem being there's no Republican that looks to have a chance of moderating the wackiness.

---

You can have Cameron :p :

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gregor-y

The problem being there's no Republican that looks to have a chance of moderating the wackiness.

---

Moderating?

It is the Liberal, Keynesian ideals embraced by the Republicans that has got us in the mess we are in!

The world needs a real Free Market Conservative in the White House ASAP!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

You can have Cameron :p :

---

Thanks, no. Riots are the last thing we need at the moment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gregor-y

The problem being there's no Republican that looks to have a chance of moderating the wackiness.

---

Gary Johnson?
Supports gay marriage and marijuana legalisation, while keeping the bible belt happy with a pro life position?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monadvspec

I find US politics very disconcerting. From what we see here this Bachmann woman is married to a guy that claims he can cure people from being gay. He may be his own best patient. Sarah Palin? Here at home she is a laughing stock and it is hoped (prayed she will not win). She is so completely out her element. Clueless in everyway about politics and the rest of the world. What is it with the witch doctor? Two people from the same party with real serious issues. Perry I know nothing about except he seems sane and the best. Only issue he has is his stance on climate change. How can anyone with a brain not see there is something happening that did not occur with the same magnitude and frequency.
Obama is good. He has had tough battles to fight but, he forgot many issues he should have tackled. Torture being one of them. Swing voters could go with Perry because of this.

---

Palin is a laughing stock here to most. She has her group of fanatical supporters, but she has no chance to win the Presidency even if she decides to run. Bachmann also has no chance. These types get some play in the media with their sound bites early on, but they disappear quickly once the campaigning gets more serious. If you take some time to learn more about Perry, you'll probably be more worried than you are now about Palin and Bachmann. I wouldn't put the word sane and Perry together unless "in" is put in front of and attached to sane.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DBell

Palin is a laughing stock here to most. She has her group of fanatical supporters, but she has no chance to win the Presidency even if she decides to run. Bachmann also has no chance. These types get some play in the media with their sound bites early on, but they disappear quickly once the campaigning gets more serious. If you take some time to learn more about Perry, you'll probably be more worried than you are now about Palin and Bachmann. I wouldn't put the word sane and Perry together unless "in" is put in front of and attached to sane.

---

Most being whom?

I assume you have proof for your rhetoric, other than your own opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DBell

Palin is a laughing stock here to most. She has her group of fanatical supporters, but she has no chance to win the Presidency even if she decides to run. Bachmann also has no chance. These types get some play in the media with their sound bites early on, but they disappear quickly once the campaigning gets more serious. If you take some time to learn more about Perry, you'll probably be more worried than you are now about Palin and Bachmann. I wouldn't put the word sane and Perry together unless "in" is put in front of and attached to sane.

---

So based on Perry's statement on illegal immigration I have written him off. Romey is a poser and not worthy. I think probably Bachmann will get the nod as a VP candidate.

We can send you our Malema if you want. We would even pay off your national debt to take him :p :