No, it wasn't. That's one reason why I think any such action as bringing Todt back, even for one race weekend, is a complete over-reaction. In truth, I don't think it will happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Printable View
No, it wasn't. That's one reason why I think any such action as bringing Todt back, even for one race weekend, is a complete over-reaction. In truth, I don't think it will happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Yeah sure! And if Hakkinen showed up in the McLaren pits next week end than they would also be destabilized. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Honestly, when one needs help than he/she should ask for it and learn from it instead of feeling "destabilized"!
One a side note I think you read to much tabloids over there. How else can you think that help can destabilize???
There was another mistake at the very beginning. They brought Massa in twice, once for changing the nose and once more for refueling, when it could have been done the first time around.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Wrong. Hakkinen was in the silver car. If a figure from the past comes into the silver car garage place it's called support. But if it's a red car it's destabilisation!!111111111111111111111111111111111 11111Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
That's rather different to the previous team boss showing up. If Hakkinen tried to show the two McLaren drivers how to drive, that would surely be unwelcome.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
By all means do it if things keep going wrong further down the line, but not yet. To do anything like this at this early stage would not be a big vote of confidence in the current set-up.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Many business/management experts would surely say exactly the same thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Wasn't the safety car out at that point, thereby preventing refuelling?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
You mean that id the SC is out they can't refuel, but they can still change a broken nose cone?Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
If that's right than the rules are even stupider than I thought they are. I thought that the pit road is either closed or open, not that it's open for certain activities but not for others. These rules are so stupid it's difficult to imagine how did they come up with them.
You might be sarcastic, but I actually think you are right. Ferrari wasn't good last year at very hot GPs, and the story continues this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
I think they still have the fastest car out there, though McLaren is very close.
Tactics were very wrong this race... makes you wonder about the new personnel in charge...
I still think they have a very high chance of winning the WCC if they can minimise reliability issues.
Maybe if you read this one you get better picture of the ruleQuote:
Originally Posted by ioan
http://www.motorsportforums.com/foru...d.php?t=125551
Ferrari had seven full GP simulations during the winter test season, in three of them they had problems so they have had reliability issues even before OZ GP. Some of these problems are related to heat so would not be a surprise to see similar engine or other component failures due to high temperature in coming GPs in Malaysia and Bahrain as they don't have time to test and find a solution for the problem(s).Quote:
Originally Posted by aryan