Over MS' No.1 position in the team (no such in the contract)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 555-04Q2

:laugh: You're right, he was going to destroy Schumi that year with a superb come from behind performance :laugh:

---

:rolleyes: 2002 was by far Rubens' best season in Formula 1 to date and beyond, but Ferrari's rotten reliabillity... hmpf, let me rephrase that; Rubens' rotten reliabillity is what put Shumi so far ahead at the 6th race. And really, why are you laughing, Ferrari shot themselves in the foot EXACTLY the same way in 1999, by allowing Shumi to score instead of Irvine, and boy, did they not learn.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VresiBerba

You didn't provide any "proof" either, because even if Brawn 'was not aware of' doesn't prove it wasn't so. Ioan, why are you so eager to prove that Shumi was not #1, a futile mission I'd say, haven't we all gone through this a dozen times already?

---

As I already said I don't try to prove he wasn't no.1 I just brought up a quote that says he wasn't a contractual no.1. But many people around here seem to be very hurt because of this and chose, like you, not to read what I posted and attack with the suppositions they have in the corner of their minds.

For me this thread proved what I thought about certain people in this forum so I'll stop here.
So as 555 said it, :wave: Vresi!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ioan

For me this thread proved what I thought about certain people in this forum so I'll stop here.

---

YOU started this thread and you can't even stand up for your own believes, chicken :laugh:

Do you honestly believe that Ferrari are going to admit to favouring one driver over the other :?:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harsha

Do you honestly believe that Ferrari are going to admit to favouring one driver over the other :?:

---

That wouldn't be surprising given their stance behind Austria 2002, but all we have here is Brawn, a former technical director saying he doean't know (is/was not aware). Had it been Todt though, he would most certainly know and that he would either tell the truth or a lie.

What we have now is not even worth debating since all Brawn said is he wasn't aware, ie. neither true nor false.

Ever since Schumacher joined Ferrari,the one driver policy has been followed,whether it is written in contract or was it a "gentleman's" agreement doesn't make the difference....

the fact remains that Schumacher was favoured over Rubens Barrichello in Ferrari,it doesn't matter whether he gained the number 1 status through his performances or through a contract.That could also be a reason why apart from FM to some extent,Schumacher never had decent team mates.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harsha

Ever since Schumacher joined Ferrari,the one driver policy has been followed,whether it is written in contract or was it a "gentleman's" agreement doesn't make the difference....

the fact remains that Schumacher was favoured over Rubens Barrichello in Ferrari,it doesn't matter whether he gained the number 1 status through his performances or through a contract.That could also be a reason why apart from FM to some extent,Schumacher never had decent team mates.

---

Now you're just being anti-Ferrari :D

i've been anti ferrari ever since the chin joined them :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VresiBerba

and boy, did they not learn.

---

They went on to win 5 WDC and 5 CC between 2000 and 2004.

Here's to not learning :beer:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 555-04Q2

They went on to win 5 WDC and 5 CC between 2000 and 2004.

Here's to not learning :beer:

---

Big deal! A title in a renault or mclaren means more than these 10. Ferrari is a dirty team and I would never believe what MS, Brawn or JT says. Lying and cheating is what they do best.