Ogier opened his mouth ,and i am sure he didnt think twice what he said.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkEmhECX...pg&name=medium
Printable View
Ogier opened his mouth ,and i am sure he didnt think twice what he said.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EkEmhECX...pg&name=medium
Transcript of the post-event press conference organised by the FIA for the 2020 Rally Italia Sardegna.
https://www.fia.com/news/wrc-d-sordo...ng-really-hard
Sorry, I am not informed enough. What particcular incident do you have in mind?
In general I agree that the rules are same for everyone, and all transgressions should be followed by a punishment. However it seems fair that the severity of the penalty depends on the severity of the transgression of the particcular rule. In this instance the limit is set to 2%, Hyundais value was 2,3%. Had it been say 4%, a more severe penalty would be natural.
So where would I draw a line? When should it be a fine, when a time penalty, when a disqualification of the driver or when should it be a disqualification of the entire team? Its a difficult question as any line, although necessary, would be arbritary. Luckily its a a question which is not up to me to answer.
That being said, obviously the rules should be applied the same way to privateers. If anything, the fine should be reduced for a similar transgression (In this instance exceeding the limitation by 0,3%)
wrong thread
What would lead them to inspect the subframe? It’s a fairly integrated part in terms of what is bolted to it, isn’t it? Would they have spotted something / totally random / had a tip off?
Let’s face it, 25g is pretty much invisible isn’t it.