:D:D
Yeah, there`s a lot of room to do donuts on a forest stage, in the ruts. Really safe also for spectators, who can get hit with a potato sized or even bigger stones (which is more probable in this case).
Printable View
:D:D
Yeah, there`s a lot of room to do donuts on a forest stage, in the ruts. Really safe also for spectators, who can get hit with a potato sized or even bigger stones (which is more probable in this case).
On Twitter he answered twice that yes he'd consider WRC2.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andre Oliveira
Sounds like M-Sport isnt an option.
Or he makes himself more wanted to pay them less...
So does that mean Craig will be in that Fiesta WRC next year?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
It actually crossed my mind, but won't work because it will mean widening the road in places, as some of the chicanes are used in specific places to slow before a corner. If there is not enough space it will cost a fortune to build extra width in the road.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
And mainly (my opinion only) but doughnuts are ridiculous in any type or motorsport... they've got nothing at all to do with competitive motorsport.
Best bet is a specific length of slow zone, within a longer zone, then the crews won't all have to brake at exactly the same point (something else that will no doubt be contentious). It could mean a 50m section, taken at 25kph, anywhere within a 200m zone. It's up to the crews if they scrub off all the speed at the start, at the end, or in the middle.
Wonder, when someone suggests a mobile-speedcam.
[QUOTE=T16;1201021]I'm not your 'pal'. I'm a little more selective than that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Mail
CC calls them a nightmare on today's Facebook post.
That's been my prediction for a while but it will always rely on finance and sponsorship.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli
I've been a Breen fan since about 2010 and he's always been able to get a drive in one way or another - either with family money or some factory deal has been obtained. I'd bet on this to continue.
[QUOTE=Got Mail;1201083]He doesn’t call tractors a nightmare. He calls moveable chicanes a nightmare.Quote:
Originally Posted by T16
Like I said, you need to re-read it.
I said I had an issue with him advocating tractors as chicanes. I think it’s stupid. I didn’t say anything about moving tractors, just tractors. You get it now?
This is the Facebook post you are referring to:
I’m with Iain Campbell on this one. There are only really two options here. If chicanes are absolutely necessary, and I’m not sure they are, but if they are, then they have to be solid or virtual. Concrete, tractors, whatever, but moveable chicanes are a nightmare! So if we have to have them, it has to be solid or virtual!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfKdNxIOcQQuote:
Originally Posted by Got Mail