I think that saying that a fine is not a penalty is splitting hairs a bit finely.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Printable View
I think that saying that a fine is not a penalty is splitting hairs a bit finely.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Check it out, the team got a fine, not the driver, because it was the teams job to release him at the right moment.Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpanda
I did check it out, call me a numpty but I couldn't find anything on the FIA site.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
However I did find this on pitpass, which contradicts you:
http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpa...s_art_id=35734
"Sure enough, shortly after the end of the race, having viewed video evidence and spoken to the driver and representatives of Ferrari, it was decided that the Brazilian had not gained any advantage from the incident, though he had breached Article 23.1 (i) of the 2008 Formula One Sporting Regulations, consequently he was fined 10,000 euros and officially reprimanded, but kept the win."
ok ok correction..THE TEAM ;-) got a penalty..and a penalty is a penalty..where other TEAMS in the past got a drive through and/or time penalty for the same..Ferrari only got a fine..Just like in the past never/ever a team and/or driver was penalised for exactly the same/or even worse action ala Hamilton...Why is that Ioan ? where is the logic ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Nail - head - hitQuote:
Originally Posted by Tonieke
:D
If they penalised Massa, they would have had to give some sort of time penalty so they couldn't.
Lol, no need to be so patronising. The F1 pitlanes are ordered so that its a single file formation out of the pits. By running alongside him its not meant to happen, if he'd taken the single file format he would have gone into the path of Sutil.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
But to wait for a car to pass, it he would have had to wait, costing him time, therefore by being released he gained a time advantage. The reason why Dnaiel thinks Hamilton should have been penalised. I'm just pointing out Massa gained a time advantage by not waiting for Sutil to pass.
By that token I think Lewis should get a drive through for having the advantage of starting on pole position on Sunday. Absolutely shocking behaviour! Gaining an advantage! How could he! :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by PolePosition_1
Felipe backed out when they reached the end of the lane , therefore negating any advantage gained by going along side .Quote:
Originally Posted by PolePosition_1
Had his team released him after waiting for Sutil to go by , he would have been roughly in the same position , so your point is either moot or completely irrelevent .
Lol, thats my point Daniel. The Stewarding is not consistant. In previous cases when the Stewards see unsafe release, they penalised with a 25s penalty. But with Massa, they saw it as unsafe, but decided against a penalty for Massa because in the eyes of the Stewards no sporting advantage was made as it didn't affect the race results. Well exactly the same for Hamilton, yet he had a full on punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Ignore what we think of the situation, lets just go purely on how the Stewards see it, both were guilty, neither gained a sporting advantage, but one was let off and another penalised.
Surely you can see the inconsistancy?
Officially because he didn't gain a sporting advantage.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tonieke
Though niether did Lewis :(