Didn't he technically do that with Kronos in 2006? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by tfp
Printable View
Didn't he technically do that with Kronos in 2006? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by tfp
yes and the "private" team of vatanen was as "private" as was the kronos citroen of Loeb.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregor-y
"Never change the winning formula" - Sebastian Loeb :champion:
Agree with you NOT. A private entrant is one who is independant and has no ties, i.e finances his car separately without any afilliation to a works team.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
Independent?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Doon
No such a thing.
Try again. ;)
Independent no...non financed yes.
Both vatanen and Loeb were payed drivers during their private years.....so they weren't that private.
Whoosh-Tish! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
U know he already did that? The year with Kronos, and believe me if he would do it now with PSWRT suddenly the DS3 will fly ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by tfp
Some people here above had the same idea about it :D
I was never sure of the exact arrangements of that, I once saw a programe on motors tv about the WRC past events, talking about Vatenans championship, and how loeb and kronos citroen's victory "diddn't count" for some reason or other? If ostberg won in sweden this year, would that count as a privateer win or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by mousti
Does anyone think that Usain Bolt should decide to race with a backpack filled with a 5 Kg weight, just so it make the challenge harder? Should Tiger Wood (at the time of his dominance) elect to go on the Master with 8 clubs, just so it's more challenging? Will Anand, in the upcoming Chess world championship should give Boris Gelfand a pawn advantage because he is clearly favorite?Quote:
Originally Posted by tfp
Why motorsport should be different: it's hard enough to win. Why volunteer any disadvantage?
Motorsport is mix driver/team, part of challenge for a driver is to get in the best car (and vice-versa).