Dennis reveals rift with Alonso..

But the question is: who's the better dancer, LEWIS or FERNANDO

But the question is: Who's the better dancer, LEWIS or FERNANDO?

Have to love good ol JPM:

Originally Posted by http://www.motorsportforums.com/foru...s/viewpost.gif
"Then he went to McLaren, and when (wife) Connie and I heard that Lewis was going to be his teammate, we said 'Oh my God.'

"We immediately felt sorry for Fernando because Lewis is Ron's baby. Ron paid his whole career, so Ron wants him to win and not Fernando. He would rather see Lewis win, who is like his own child to Ron. Fernando is nothing to him."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/62583

well, what can you say, ioan. :o

Alonso should've talked to Montoya first before accepting that contract with McLaren. The best information you can get on any employer is from those that had worked there before, that way you won't get blindsided by news of their real intentions.

Well, Nigel Roebuck says in this week's Autosport that it is likely that, in Hungary, Alonso demanded in a meeting that Dennis slow Hamilton down or maybe even drop him at the end of the season.

before or after the incident?

now is interesting to see Rd didn't listen to him anyway, while I think Lewis' dad could demand RD to wear pink wigs and he'd do it!

There's a pattern in how RD selects drivers lineup. Sometimes he tries to combine a proven champ with a young star. The idea is to have the champ educate the youngster. He did it with Prost and Senna and now with Alonso and Hamilton. He also tried it in 1997 with Hill and Hakkinen, but Hill refused to be Hakkinen's deputy. Problem start when the youngster proves equal to the champ and the relationship get explosive. Ron should have learned long ago all advantages and disadvantages of this method.

Ron might have forgotten this theory, combination of drivers whomever Kimi partnered with didn't raise any explosive. :)