Printable View
So you're in favour of getting rid of "non-jobs", your phrase de jour, but quite happy to create jobs which dupicate existing roles? For goodness sake man, make your mind up. What little credibility you may have once had is long gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight
But they won't duplicate will they if the first lot are sacked, doh!
Talk of credibility yet can't even follow plain English.
It really is not that hard to follow, too many people are doing jobs that just aren't needed, and they are useless at their jobs too yet are paid handsomely for doing sweet FA, meetings about meetings doing nowt, yet feeling v important about themselves.
They are parasites and need treating as such. They are worse than dole scroungers as they cost so much more.
I do apologise if I've confused you, I shall try ever so hard to explain myself clearly. The duplication arises not from replacing sacked public sector staff with a similar headcount in the private sector, that much is so obvious that I didn't feel it needed spelling out. Rather, the problem is that instead of having a small number of commissioning bodies, the coalition's plans involve each GP cluster potentially becoming a commissioning body in its own right. Each of which will need to either find their own staff (and this is where the potential for an increase in headcount arises), or to buy in services from private providers (who will need to produce a profit).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight
Profit in itself is not "a bad thing", far from it; but these plans lay the way for the private sector to profit from something which is currently provided by NHS staff.
Any thoughts yet about the Taxpayers Alliance report being debunked as worthless, by the way? (Little hint for you before you try to dismiss my source as biased: switch on your irony detector and ask yourself whether there could possibly be any bias in your own source ;) )
Yet more guesswork........
It would be nigh on impossible to make it less efficient than it is now.
And the private sector would pay more realistic wages than the public sector so if there is an increase in numbers it'll still be cheaper, so not sure what your beef is.
Unless of course you have a vested interest in useless unemployable people being paid well for doing non essential work, well do you?
Liberal Conspiracy - what a flaming joke, you'd have to be stark raving mad to believe anything that site said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave B
Facepalm, as I believe the youth of today are fond of saying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight
So it is fact when a site you find says one thing but utter rubbish when one I find says something different
facepalm indeed
I love the private sector too, they pay me about 7-8 times what I get paid by the NHS for the same work. Can't beat it!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight
No as what they say makes sense unlike some unheard of loony fringe website, Liberal conspiracy indeed, epic fail quoting that website, well done.Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88