What makes a person a citizen

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

5th January 2011, 22:15
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by glauistean

My My.
I will sit back and enjoy me with my wife.

Fine.
6th January 2011, 12:30
chuck34

Quote:

Originally Posted by glauistean

My My.
Riebe, Anthony and Roamy all come charging over my post. To state I am surprised would be totally untrue. To try to minimize what I stated. Well, that is absolute.

To discredit my credentials, well That too is par for the course. People of their ilk are prone to this type of rabid defense of one another and their lack of understanding of what is said is evident in their sad and sorry posts.

Tell you what I'll so for you three. I will let you go ahead with your attempts at discrediting me with your limited knowledge and I will sit back and enjoy with my wife and share the words that are spoken/written by all of you.

Roamy jumps to the defence of someone that does not answer questions and then proceeds to lambaste me. Was the same moral compass applied to Riebe ? No , it was not. You are all perfect examples of what I see on may days and for whomever it was that spoke the gibberish about my ability to converse on the topic I would gladly in a private chat disclose to you my credentials.

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under. Seems there are quite a few around here with multiple personalities. That should interest you.

Let's get another thing straight. I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR CREDENTIALS. You completely missed my point, once again (for someone who is soooo smart you seem to do that quite often) so let me spell it out for you. This is an internet forum about motorsports. Since it is on the internet, you could claim to be anyone you wanted even the most highly degreed doctorate of psychology or whatever you want. And maybe you are, maybe you're not. I don't have any way to prove it, and I don't care. Also, as this is a motorsports forum, psych creds don't matter much.

And one other thing to get straight. I never expected you to actually converse on the topic, as you haven't yet in any thread I've run into you. It always ends with you "diagnosing" someone. Get a new act dude.
6th January 2011, 16:11
glauistean

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuck34

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under. Seems there are quite a few around here with multiple personalities. That should interest you.

Let's get another thing straight. I DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR CREDENTIALS. You completely missed my point, once again (for someone who is soooo smart you seem to do that quite often) so let me spell it out for you. This is an internet forum about motorsports. Since it is on the internet, you could claim to be anyone you wanted even the most highly degreed doctorate of psychology or whatever you want. And maybe you are, maybe you're not. I don't have any way to prove it, and I don't care. Also, as this is a motorsports forum, psych creds don't matter much.

And one other thing to get straight. I never expected you to actually converse on the topic, as you haven't yet in any thread I've run into you. It always ends with you "diagnosing" someone. Get a new act dude.

"Always diagnosing someone". Is that so? This NOT a motorsport Forum, rather a forum contained within a motorsport forum. I am, as you can see 34 addressing you.

I would presume/assume/imagine at this time that most people would believe that the Internet is an area where anyone can be anything or anyone they like. Take you for instance. You are a complete and utter sham. My opinion of course.You can't address an issue because you lack the ability. You immediately believe that I am referring to you specifically as implied by your (above) post, when in fact I was addressing three people. You being one of them.

In case you missed something 34, I started this thread and have conversed on it. You have been selective in what you want to respond to. Usually it is when I make a comment after disparaging remarks about some member of government or party. Usually, these comments are baseless as are yours.

As for diagnosing. I don't diagnose. I give opinions when there is a direct and noxious comment made with reference to me.

You being one of the three mentioned I am not going to apologize to you and I would hazard a guess that you would want one.

You want me to be bombastic. I know this. I also know that you care to respond to your idiocy because you want to project to others that read these posts the fact that you are so smart and smarter than me the highly intelligent one of which you have ascribed that label and not me.

So, since you do not care about me or my comments or threads I would suggest you ignore them or my posts. They seem to cause you undue angst.
6th January 2011, 23:28
chuck34

Quote:

Originally Posted by glauistean

"Always diagnosing someone". Is that so? This NOT a motorsport Forum, rather a forum contained within a motorsport forum. I am, as you can see 34 addressing you.

I would presume/assume/imagine at this time that most people would believe that the Internet is an area where anyone can be anything or anyone they like. Take you for instance. You are a complete and utter sham. My opinion of course.You can't address an issue because you lack the ability. You immediately believe that I am referring to you specifically as implied by your (above) post, when in fact I was addressing three people. You being one of them.

In case you missed something 34, I started this thread and have conversed on it. You have been selective in what you want to respond to. Usually it is when I make a comment after disparaging remarks about some member of government or party. Usually, these comments are baseless as are yours.

As for diagnosing. I don't diagnose. I give opinions when there is a direct and noxious comment made with reference to me.

You being one of the three mentioned I am not going to apologize to you and I would hazard a guess that you would want one.

You want me to be bombastic. I know this. I also know that you care to respond to your idiocy because you want to project to others that read these posts the fact that you are so smart and smarter than me the highly intelligent one of which you have ascribed that label and not me.

So, since you do not care about me or my comments or threads I would suggest you ignore them or my posts. They seem to cause you undue angst.

Once again everything you try to label me with is very easilly applied to you. For instance, you call me a sham. However, I am not the one who has claimed to be anything. On the other hand you are continually proclaiming how great your psych cred is. That my friend is clasic projection, so I am left to know you are a sham.
7th January 2011, 03:52
glauistean

Chuck,
repetition is a form of transference and is clinically a form of ontogeneric retardation.
Don't panic and have a hissy fit. Retardation has many meaning in psychiatry and does not imply that you are incapable of understanding. Clinically speaking it is your posts that evade and repeat that shows that you are angered at not being able to summon a cogent thought to express yourself. You use the poster (me) as your means to vent your frustration and use my analysis of you to gain vindication.

Once again, I challenge you to show me one post where I have stated or proclaimed that I have this "great psych cred". It should not be hard to find since you have stated that it is continuous.
7th January 2011, 05:01
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuck34

Not sure if you are calling me Roamy. If so, you should know I am not. I am chuck34, that is the ONLY name I post under.

Chuck he is a troll and he is baiting you.
Notice how he starts threads and then abandones the topic to start pointing out others faults, whilst ignoring the topic he supposedly was wondering about.

Don't feed the troll.
7th January 2011, 06:47
ShiftingGears

Quote:

Originally Posted by glauistean

If you read the post and understood what I stated you would not reply with

the "frothing" at the mouth comment which in fact is more reflective of you

than me.

Actually I did read your post and understood what you stated, which is exactly why I responded with the comment that I did, thankyou very much.

As for Australian citizenship, I am unsure. However it is not easy for people seeking asylum status to legally gain access to Australia, at all. This is probably moreso true for the US, due to sharing borders with a significantly disadvantaged country.
7th January 2011, 08:03
glauistean

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Look it up yourself, pay me and I will do it for you, but without money, find it yourself.
If you are too inept, que sera-sera, if you too lazy, tough.

Stick to the thread title, your trolling bs, is childish and boring.

You are the epitome of ignorance and hypocrisy. You would be lost if you did not have me to tarnish, or attempt to. You speak in gibberish that only children use and then go along doing exactly what you have chastised me for doing. Now, this is the second post that you have failed to attempt to even remotely address the topic of the thread.

Riebe, you are typical of those that fall into the sad state of the catatonic. You cause me dismay and I worry for anyone that has to endure your endless streams of "look what he just said, bwaaaaahhahhh", let me contact Chuck 34 because he really likes me and will understand what it is I'm saying". I hasten to add that he probably does as no one else could.

By the way, any chance you would one day support your idiotic claims with fact?
7th January 2011, 22:20
JackSparrow

Obviously not the bs that's being posted here :confused:
Well maybe third class citizens!
7th January 2011, 23:18
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by glauistean

By the way, any chance you would one day support your idiotic claims with fact?

The day after you do, which will also be the day after hell freezes.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page