Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
Like this one would not have sufficed:
http://www.motorsportforums.com/foru...d.php?t=137258
Oh but then your headline of "What a boring race" would not have been so prominent. What a bore.
Gary
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
Like this one would not have sufficed:
http://www.motorsportforums.com/foru...d.php?t=137258
Oh but then your headline of "What a boring race" would not have been so prominent. What a bore.
Gary
Yes, but F-1.com wants you to know that you're wrong:
http://www.formula1.com/news/headlin...0/3/10531.htmlQuote:
And the general verdict is that the ban of refuelling, while creating a slow-burn effect initially, made the racing much more exciting.
Oh FFS he started a thread, if you want I can call a waaaaaaambulance for you. If you don't like it don't read it.Quote:
Originally Posted by garyshell
What they need to do is
-Get rid of the stupid rule making the top 10 start on the tyres they qualified on
-Get rid of the even more stupid rule having two sets of tyres that need to be used in one race (so people can run non-stop if they want)
-Have the tyre supplier bring their entire inventory of tyres from very hard to very soft just like they used to. Allow the teams to run what they want, when they want it, at any point during the race.
As for the problems with overtaking due to aerodynamics and such, well no amount of silly mickey mouse regulations will fix that, unless they decide to go the whole hog and script the races WWF-style (which is what some people seem to want). Watch tin-tops or Formula Ford for that.
Yeah it was ok - no better than ok but not necessarily a borefest.Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateDanGTR
to quote from tinchote
stupid rules , stupid consequences
Honestly I enjoyed the race very much, but because Ferrari won. Without Vettel's problems, I would probably have disappointed despite the interesting duel between the German and Alonso.
that was the most boringist race I have ever seen imho
Yes, it seems that the latest design goal is no longer to merely produce more downforce but to create turbulence designed to act in such a manner as to make it very difficult to pass.....Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Pu
I wonder about some of those winglets, and if they are really helping handling or downforce, but just creating more turbulence.
Appearently, the venturi tunnels under the IRL cars are less effected by turbulence than are the wings, but at same time, do not produce the turbulence in their wake anywhere close to the DD. :vader:
Result:
This race was totally BORING after lap 2 or 3, and even the Vettel broken pipe, did not add any excitment since we all knew it was only a question of time before he was passed....and even those passes were like..... boring. :(
Take that busted pipe away, and there was not any point to watching the rest of race, unless you are such a die hard fan of a particular driver like Freddie, Lewis, yadada, that you just had to watch the rest of the race to see if they got lucky because somebody broke down in front and they picked up a spot...or even a win.....whoopie...I guess :rolleyes:
Thank God for my old VCR so I do not waste two hours of my life for nothing....
Agreed. Not to sound like a broken record but I have mentioned the turbulence in the past and said that the FIA should mandate that the air a certain distance past the car is laminar, ie not turbulentQuote:
Originally Posted by markabilly