Who say what is acceptable and what is not?Quote:
Originally Posted by studiose
Printable View
Who say what is acceptable and what is not?Quote:
Originally Posted by studiose
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: I am sure that saddened him greatly during his life that some internet nobody did not respect him.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamburello
Hilarious stuff.
I do not think that any true motor racing enthusiast should ever be pleased to see something like that happen, no matter what one's allegiance might be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
Why bother offering any opinions on here, then?Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
DANIEL.
Whoo-hoo, Way to go little boy :rolleyes: Listen up & listen up good.
DO NOT change other peoples comments, to amuse yourself, when you quote them, it does NOTHING but show up a frankly pathetic arrogance, akin to that of your buddy tamburello.
The very fact that Hitler was brought up in ANY context in a motorsport forum shows abject crassness to the hilt by it's very inclusion, plus knowing as we do, the posters personal opinion of Senna, the fact that he elected to make a Hitler reference when in the Remembrance thread was hardly an 'innocent' move, & no matter what the wording anyone with half a nouce could deduce the implication.
imo
I was not a fan of Senna, although I have to admit I greatly admired his will to succeed and his "only winning counts" mentality.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I just thought it was justice that was done to Prost after the stunts he and Balestre pulled in 1989 and 1990.
I dont think that makes me any less or more a racing enthusiast.
I fail to see the relevance of what you said.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
I'm afraid I do, because I don't think that there is any room in motorsport for retribution in that way, especially in circumstances that could have been highly dangerous (unlike the tangle between Senna and Prost the previous year, which was probably unnecessary, but extremely mild). I also do not believe there is any actual evidence for the 'French conspiracy' that you described.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
What is wrong with tamburello saying that Senna lost his respect in that way? That statement was no different to your comment above about Irvine having been arrogant towards Senna. I could just as easily have responded to that, or any of the other opinions you or anyone else expresses, in the same way as you responded to tamburello.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
You're speaking about Senna or yourself? Help me out here.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamburello
I am sure you will not be very greatly surprised when I say that I really am not even in the slightest bothered by that.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Why are you not attacking prost then? After all, his desire to get one back at Senna was the cause behind the crash in 1989, because Senna had him his bitch the previous 2 seasons.Quote:
because I don't think that there is any room in motorsport for retribution in that way
Yes, it was dangerous for sure, but motor racing is dangerous.Quote:
especially in circumstances that could have been highly dangerous (unlike the tangle between Senna and Prost the previous year, which was probably unnecessary, but extremely mild).
I am not saying what Senna did was right, but it has been overblown as an incident, when there have been so many dangerous other accidents, but they seem to be completely overlooked.
Did Balestre not actually confess to helping Prost? In any case, one has to be quite naive to think Senna was given fair treatment by Balestre.Quote:
I also do not believe there is any actual evidence for the 'French conspiracy' that you described.
Tamburello said that Senna never earned his respect and it speaks volumes about how importantly he views himself. I find that hilarious.Quote:
What is wrong with tamburello saying that Senna lost his respect in that way? That statement was no different to your comment above about Irvine having been arrogant towards Senna. I could just as easily have responded to that, or any of the other opinions you or anyone else expresses, in the same way as you responded to tamburello.
Hyperbole is often just something that makes those of a certain intellectual level believe that they have hit an ace. Usually I encounter those who bring up the Nazis or Hitler on political boards. That someone would bring it up here is rather telling... sad, but telling.Quote:
Originally Posted by elis
Whether I agree with someone or not, I believe that everyone is entitled to an opinion. It's the explanation of the opinion that often makes things interesting. With some people, if you let them talk long enough, they will make your point for you. At some base level, their opinion might be valid. But the roadmap they used to get there probably looks like a deep fried pretzel. IMO, some people are making very valid points in regard to Senna (positive and negative). And some... well... maybe time to come out of the deep fryer.