Mosley 'knows' who set him up

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by markabilly

Private it was and private it should have remained.

All too true this:




BUT even so, it never should have happenned and afterwards, it should have died a death of silence after all the initial fussing.
Said so in a number of posts.

Then he files his case, and sits there in most pompous fashion, not much regard for family, and goes on about some theater for whores and his lifestyle, making it all public and proud. As such it calls his basic character into question, to say the least. And the funny most bizzar thing is that he gets away with it......

You say "certain arrogance on Max's part; a belief that he was untouchable"
well you are very wrong, because you say it in the past tense. If anything this episode has proven his arrogance to be well placed and he is untouchable

and his continued comments from him sprewing forth about who be behind the plot against his throne and dictatorship continues to prove his arrogance is very justified.

:vader:

---

Whislt I appreciate your viewpoint. Its totally based on on your moral views. In the eyes of the law and in the eyes of personal freedom, he hasn't actually done anything wrong. To you he has, because of your views. In same way extreme islamics think the west are wrong. Whilst I guess from their viewpoint I can understand, at the end of the day its just a different viewpoint.

Law and order is there to protect us, and it currently stands (in western societies at least) to respect eachothers differences, including lifestyles. Moral viewpoints shouldn't be used as a form of deciding what is wrong and right on people. You can hold that view, but should discriminate them.

I suppose the sanctions would be based on the "bringing the sport into disrepute" rule.

I believe he should just shut up.

And if he's right, if there's an F1 character behind this... well boy... what a silly bot you are. You really thought shame would make this dude go? :laugh: . I think they should put his picture for shameless in the dictionaries.

The question in these cases has to be whether someone is a hypocrite. Had Max spoken out before in favour of 'family values', or something, then I would agree that he should have resigned. But he didn't.

Doesn't stop the story still being funny, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PolePosition_1

Because he is a public figure he's not entitled to a private sex life?

---

Absolutely. Yes he is entitled to a private life of his choosing. What he got up to was of no relevance to motorsport, or his role as FIA President until it became public. Once that happened Max the private individual merged with Max the FIA President, and that cannot be undone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

Absolutely. Yes he is entitled to a private life of his choosing. What he got up to was of no relevance to motorsport, or his role as FIA President until it became public. Once that happened Max the private individual merged with Max the FIA President, and that cannot be undone.

---

But it wasn't his fault that his private life got merged with his public status.

If he quit, it would be a victory for tabloid journalism and in effect a true trial (for his job) by tabloid media.

Why should he quit through no fault of his own?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PolePosition_1

Because he is a public figure he's not entitled to a private sex life?

I think people here need to wake up, theres absolutely no case with regards to his privacy being invaded, your simply trying to justify him being caught because your morally against his way of life.

---

:dozey: Any reputable public organization, would have dumped Mad Max in a New York second, after his egregious sexual activities became known to the public.

:rolleyes: The fact that he was caught (not the how)... would have ended his career.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trumperZ06

:dozey: Any reputable public organization, would have dumped Mad Max in a New York second, after his egregious sexual activities became known to the public.

:rolleyes: The fact that he was caught (not the how)... would have ended his career.

---

And you think that its right that being caught doing something perfectly legal, but not conformed to societies view of 'normal' should warrant his loss of professional reputation and job?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1

Absolutely. Yes he is entitled to a private life of his choosing. What he got up to was of no relevance to motorsport, or his role as FIA President until it became public. Once that happened Max the private individual merged with Max the FIA President, and that cannot be undone.

---

In a sense , I agree with you , that once it became public , it suddenly had relevance to motorsport , but , for a different reason .

Max's private life isn't private any more , not because he was targetted by the NOTW , but because , it seems , someone from the F1 world commissioned someone to sting him .
It is not such a leap to imagine that those same people were involved in lobbying the world's member countries to oust him for the public shame that was created .

The NOTW were only sued for the Nazi allegations .
It was said that they were approached with the video .

So , it is certainly related to F1 , however , not because the man could'nt do the job then or now , rather that he was attacked by someone within the circle , or so he says .

He must decide how much damage it could do to F1 by bringing forth those names , and that may well be why he's going to leave it a few years .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PolePosition_1

And you think that its right that being caught doing something perfectly legal, but not conformed to societies view of 'normal' should warrant his loss of professional reputation and job?

---

;) "Moral Clauses" are written into a lot of employment contracts World-Wide to protect the parent organization from being tarnished by employees ingaged in such actions.

:rolleyes: The fact that Max finds it necessary to still be talking about "being caught" shows that his actions have brought "Disrepute" to the FIA !!!

It's NOT the HOW he was caught that matters to the public !!!

It's THAT he was caught involved in inegregious actions that tarishes the FIA's image.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trumperZ06

;) "Moral Clauses" are written into a lot of employment contracts World-Wide to protect the parent organization from being tarnished by employees ingaged in such actions.

:rolleyes: The fact that Max finds it necessary to still be talking about "being caught" shows that his actions have brought "Disrepute" to the FIA !!!

It's NOT the HOW he was caught that matters to the public !!!

It's THAT he was caught involved in inegregious actions that tarishes the FIA's image.

---

How about the fact that someone stooped so low as to try to sting him out of office ?
How do you feel about those folks ?