Printable View
Mosley is however a trained barrister, and some my class his bahaviour as obscene. :dozey:Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
The comparison between the public having an insight into their respective private lives is not, however, comparing apples with oranges.
You aint the man from Del Monte by the way are you, all this talk of fruit..... :rolleyes:
ioan say yes. :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
As I said people are comparing apples and oranges!Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Well at least it would mean I know the difference between an apples and oranges! :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by Monaro Doorslammer
Actuallly to me the case resembles the one against Bill Clinton.
Brilliant counter attack, I must say! Maybe the best since The Batavian revolt!Quote:
Originally Posted by F1boat
A compelling rebuttle to an almost perfect arguement. It's one flaw is this guys lying his @ss off
about not knowing his web page could be viewed on the world wide web! :rotflmao:
ioan is right.
it is apples and oranges.
both public figures in positions of judgement over others.
both live indecent private lives.
both caught (and, according to max himself, it doesn't matter how one gets caught).
the american one stood down. the english one didn't.
apples and oranges.
I was sure Clinton served out his term after the coup to have him impeachedQuote:
Originally Posted by Mickey T
failed :p :
When did Max start sitting in judgement of matters dealing with sexual habits and preferences? This Judge excused himself from a case. A federal judge has an administration that appointed him to answer to. It's not all together clear what this mans motivation was.
Max on the other hand is sitting in judgement of things automotive! (I don't think his advice or decisions determine how far a virgin goes in the back seat of a car on a first date! Or if she participates in rough sex) Max does not have a higher up in the FIA. The argument is that he is acting on his own behalf, with out being removed.
This judge (according to the link) has excused himself from a case, NOT A JOB!!
In concluding, I have to agree with Ioan. This is not a completely similar situation and therefore can't be viewed as the same thing. Similar I will agree!
Max was not trying to make his private life public! I think this other Knucklehead was, on some level!
JMHO
An interesting read I think! From an F1 business perspective!
One sport insider says: "However much the teams may disapprove of his behaviour, the line Mosley takes within Formula One is a line they, largely, support. The worry is that if he went, then it could all fall into other, unknown, hands." He says that Mosley provides a counterpoint to Formula One Holdings owner Bernie Ecclestone, and that "he can be relied upon to take a view of what is going to make the most successful future of motor racing".
http://www.mad.co.uk/Main/News/Artic...tomobiles.html
One judging a sexual affair while the other is in charge of the needs of the drivers. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey T
Must be the same thing for you! :D
Tell me which one are orange the apples or the oranges?! :p :