How?Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
Printable View
How?Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
beacause they have managed the adverse effect of carrying the extra weight this year, and will undoubtedly have learned things about weight distribution management. dropping Kers, but having extra weight from fuel might mean that they are able to understand and manage that better than teams that didn't run Kers this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
They didnt carry extra weight, they just had less ballast to play with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
His point is still valid, Mr Pedantic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
Name calling aside looks like 3rd place in the constructors standings is lost now.
No, it is not, bronky.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
they carry the weight in a less advantageous position, the experience of which will be useful IMOQuote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
I fail to see how that will be the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
beacause with extra fuel weight the cars handling will be affected - from this seasons running with Kers they have experienced a bit about running with weight, other than ballast, where they don't really want it and where it affects cars handling. it might not make a massive amount of difference, but i think it will be useful to them as they've effectively been testing with extra weight in the middle of the car all year, sometimes without the benefit of the extra power when the device wasn't working.
But the chassis will be different from this year's one, plus this year's car never really behaved great so the data is pretty much useless if you want to do a better car.Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinho
Also the tires will be different next season.