You know who the cameraman is, right? Or more importantly, who he works for / with,
and in what capacity?
I wouldn't have said the 'conspiracy' involved the whole team. Just the one crew. In fact, such a small circle of trust to the point that none of the other crews being serviced by the same team (I hesitate to call them team-mates in this instance) probably had a clue the 'sting' was happening. But a sting WAS happening.
Taking the facts that are available to us into consideration, it seems that the protesting crew:
-knew this corner would be somewhere a committed driver with lots of Belgian experience would take
a bigger than legal cut
-sent their man to film at that location with the express intent of gathering evidence of car 24 taking such a cut
-made sure they were as neat and tidy as possible to set a nice contrast
-sat on the evidence until the end of the event, then tried to use it to get a crew that had beaten them fairly resoundingly over three days of rallying enough of a penalty to overhaul them
I don't like it. The stewards shouldn't have entertained it. The organisers shouldn't have allowed it to happen. Tell me why I'm wrong.