nice video. not sure if it's because of the rough surface but the car didn't look as boring on tarmac as some of us are expecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
Printable View
nice video. not sure if it's because of the rough surface but the car didn't look as boring on tarmac as some of us are expecting.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
VIDEO: Tarmac Test Volkswagen Polo R WRC 2017!
http://i66.tinypic.com/2qi8bki.jpg
Click on the photo or here --> https://youtu.be/T6AT0XzkJfE
seems its very slippery the surface.Quote:
Originally Posted by seb_sh
Sordo is back https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfQ6...ature=youtu.be
How could a faster car be boring?Quote:
Originally Posted by seb_sh
Of course it can and very often it is. There are countless examples.
For example stock Evo IX is faster than Quattro S1. Which one do You prefer to watch?
You seem to compare cars with 20 years difference, what is the point? And who said Evo is boring?
That one is more boring while being faster. Isn't that exactly what You wrote?Quote:
Originally Posted by stefanvv
Do You prefer stock Evo over S1?Quote:
Originally Posted by stefanvv
Evo's are boring to watch. Period.Quote:
Originally Posted by stefanvv
Only few chosen ones can drive evo's flamboyant and fast.
Sent from my ONE E1003 using Tapatalk
I don't get Your point of '17 vs '16 rules. Of course I prefer S1, but it is with its time. In Evo IX times there could be much better than S1, but this is irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek