Ogier roll
http://www.wrc.com/video/browse-all/...ss16/?vid=2160
Printable View
look championship table and remember also that rally was at the beginning also the reliability race...Quote:
Originally Posted by Wim_Impreza
Loeb was not approved of by the FIA to receive the nessesary superlicense which is required to drive in F1 due to lack of racing experience. see this link:Quote:
Originally Posted by tfp
http://www.totalf1.com/full_story/vi...p_on_F1_dream/ it has nothing to do with being afraid of loosing.
I also think Loeb wanted to show that he could equally as fast with the new cars as well as with the old ones. And if he would take the title this year too (quite likely) then he would be the last winner
of the old WRC Cars and the first winner with the new 1,6T cars. I think that would be motivation enough for a final season in the WRC before moving on to GT Racing.
If you´d put this kind of Easter eggs on Loeb´s route as well then even he would be stoppable:
http://img.mtv3.fi/mn_kuvat/mtv3/urh...max555x555.jpg
I have doubts this stone was on the road unintentionally...
Interesting to see same place from the second car onboard...
Mikko Hirvonen was 0.057s faster than Loeb on Power Stage.
http://200.58.126.155/wp-content/upl...OWER-STAGE.pdf
You mean that for 6 years somebody put stones on the road except Loeb, in Argentina?
Get real guys....
The stone is real. Next car was Solberg's. I'd like to see stage 13 from Solverg car.
After the impact the stone hardly remained placed in the middle of the road. Back in 2009 at Rally Finland's shakedown Hirvonen rolled a similar sized stone right next to my feet - but he wasn't first on the road. Tough luck for JML.Quote:
Originally Posted by sbrytskyy
MTV3.fi continues on the Citroen's making a shortcut on SS7. Apparently all drivers signed a similar contract before recce that the place would be driven on the right side of the traffic divider, not left. It've been calculated from the in-car's that Citroen's gained some 4 secs by taking the left side.
It sounds rather odd that driver's are making agreements on top of what roadbook says. And if it was meant to be driven from the right side of the divider, why left side wasn't blocked by anything? Safety issue?