Rather than personal attacks, why not get back to the facts I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Then again, why ;)
:laugh:
Printable View
Rather than personal attacks, why not get back to the facts I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Then again, why ;)
:laugh:
Good point.Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpanda
I think that the rule is pretty ambiguous.
For example, in the PdlR / Schumacher example, Schumacher went off track and gained an advantage by not losing his position which he would have done otherwise. However, he gained no "actual" advantage regarding race position.
However, he did gain an advantage by going off track as he would have lost his place but there was no penalty.
With Kimi at the beginning, he made a mistake and went off track but rejoined in the same place thereby not gaining any advantage but did not lose a place or any time.
Is this to be considered an advantage though as there was no penalty for going off track and although he gained benefit by going off track in not losing a position he otherwise would have done, he didn't gain a place.
With Lewis, before he had to avoid a collision, he was partially alongside. Then he cut the chicane and ended up ahead so he lifted giving Kimi the lead, about a cars length gap and superior momentum down the straight meaning he was in a worse position than before he cut the chicane.
Yet he is further penalise 25 seconds when the others who it could be argued benefited from going off track were not penalised.
Regardless of the teams or drivers involved, this is obviously wrong isn't it?
I've not personally attacked you at all. Stop trying to cause trouble. As you can see above I'm happy to talk facts. It seems you're the one going on about bias :mark:Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Then again gerbil telephone pesticide woop woop! ;)
:laugh:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malllen
Yes but he still gained an advantage from his competitor. Its not the competitors fault Alonso sped off being realising he had to let him pass.
And the link provided, to my knowledge he didn't get penalised for this move. Have you got source for your claim?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas123f1
But Hamilton was so much quicker in those conditions. He caught him up 2s that lap alone. Surely even if he'd take the chicane, he'd have got past him eventually. Plus fact Kimi crashed, no sporting advantage was gained, reason for Massa not getting penalised at last race.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Well, rather than going obout telling people how rude they are :rolleyes: perhaps you would care to answer this post.
I will repeat the facts.
In the PdlR / Schumacher example, Schumacher went off track and gained an advantage by not losing his position which he would have done otherwise. However, he gained no "actual" advantage regarding race position.
However, he did gain an advantage by going off track as he would have lost his place but there was no penalty.
With Kimi at the beginning at Spa, he made a mistake and went off track but rejoined in the same race position thereby not gaining any advantage but did not lose a place or any time which he would have done if, for example, there was gravel there instead of nice sticky tarmac.
Is this to be considered an advantage though as there was no penalty for going off track and although he gained benefit by going off track in not losing a position he otherwise would have done, he didn't gain a place but merely maintained one.
With Lewis, before he had to avoid a collision, he was partially alongside. Then he cut the chicane and ended up ahead so he lifted giving Kimi the lead, about a cars length gap and superior momentum down the straight meaning he was in a worse position than before he cut the chicane.
Yet he is further penalise 25 seconds when the others who it could be argued benefited from going off track were not penalised.
Regardless of the teams or drivers involved, this is obviously wrong isn't it?
Yes but in the past what Hamilton has done is enough. But when he does it its not.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Plus no sporting advantage gained, reason given for not penalising Massa.
Its like Schumacher is allowed to save a position by cutting a chicane, but when Hamilton does, its a drive through penalty...
Its not Ferrari's fault, but they always seem to benefit from inconsistant Steward decisions.
Thats a good point. Or a couple of years back, I remember Schumacher overtaking off the circuit after the hairpin....no penalty.Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpanda
Again, not Ferrari's fault, but highlighting inconsistancies with a tendency to favour Ferrari.
Drivers have always let cars past if they overtake by cutting a chicane, and that is enough to not get penalised. But apparently McLaren should have guessed that the Stewards were going to take into account the time he would have lost had he taken the chicane properly.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
"I got in his tow ..." -Lewis Hamilton .
"Fortunately , I got back in his slipstream ..." -Lewis Hamilton .
"Shut up , Lauda . " - bagwan .