Originally Posted by sollitt
I think that's harsh, and far from true. There's a huge depth of talent on tap with the present drivers, the young Tanak, Paddon, Nikara and the top IRC contenders, Hanninen etc... . Not to mention a few older ex WRC pilots still hanging around the fringes.
The issue is the mountain is so much tougher to climb than in other era. Regardless of talent or financial backing these guys simply cannot sit in a Loeb spec Citroen or the Ford equivalent so you cannot assess their ability accurately.
And when & if they do ever get the chance, they have to contend with the master himself with a decade unchallenged at the top and for whom the car is as comfortable as an old slipper.
I think too much is being made of the D-Mack tyre. Not enough is known to make assessment here on whether he would have been faster, better, cleaner, on Michellin's. The fact that Tanak lost speed toward the end of long stages could simply be a concentration issue. He wouldn't be the first.
The fact that we're talking about him is fair indication that he's already an exciting and class act.