guns and their cost in lives and

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by janneppi

I read the post ralfheartedly as follows...

Had to read it again with bit more attention. :)

---

Same here. I hope it was a good shot and Easy's mother didn't suffer.

Wonder how they cooked her, or did they eat her raw.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

[...]obtuse, ignorant, and if you have a degree as you state, an embarrassment [...]

You babble and say nothing. [...]

[...]rabid tirade and pompous arogance[...]

---

wade is that you? :wave:
:dozey:
:bandit:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Which character in Merchant of Venice? Oh, and by the way, if you received a degree in English literature you sure as hell did not do so well in the writing and verbalizing category. As I stated in my prior post "substantiating your posture" in the manner that you wrote it has absolutely no meaning. It is obtuse, ignorant, and if you have a degree as you state, an embarrassment to whomever it was that tried to lecture you.

You babble and say nothing. You use words that you do not know the meaning and then when you do find a word you use it out of context.

If you believe that I care for your rabid tirade and pompous arogance as you try to deflect your abhorrence for me into an insult and defence of another, then try again.

---

LOL You are very angry :s mokin:

I need to proof read better. :D
At least I added a smile to offset a very nasty bunch of posts by one member in particular.
For all his verbosity I am not sure if he has actually proposed anything vaguely workable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

If I erred I apologize. The onus is on you to post your response clearly so

that the person answering does not have to deduce to whom you are referring.

That you know who you are referring to is inconsequential. Make yourself a little clearer in future.

---

Go back and look.
I quoted just the one line, it was there in the little box that says "Quote Starter"
I can do no better.
If I said what I though of his brilliance (that is high sarcasm and satire)
there would be a screen of xxxxx and xxxxx xxxxx..

As I said, I only post highlights of the most egregious lies and bungles.
They---those ditto-heads---are not serious, it is folly to waste time attempting to even suggest any point of view other than their Talk radio or at best "History Channel"---for the intellectuals among them--- received versions of knowledge. In other words, if I wanted to debate with people having a 5th or at most 6th Grade level of understanding of US History and culture, I would argue with 5th or 6th Graders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

If I erred I apologize. The onus is on you to post your response clearly so

that the person answering does not have to deduce to whom you are referring.

That you know who you are referring to is inconsequential. Make yourself a little clearer in future.

---

As far as I can tell only one person didn't understand what was posted. If he types really slow next time, double spaces, and uses smaller words will that help some?

:laugh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by airshifter

As far as I can tell only one person didn't understand what was posted. If he types really slow next time, double spaces, and uses smaller words will that help some?

:laugh:

---

I don't know. What do you think? :) Are you familiar with the premise that there is occasion when the most astute miss the obvious?

Never mind. You are one of those that likes to pander and post nonsense to get plaudits while unable to contribute anything of substance nor understand it when it is staring you in the face. Hence your inane post.

glauistean really says:
I don't know anything. What do you think? :) Are you familiar with the premise that there is occasion when the most astute miss the obvious, which has nothing to do with me?

Never mind. I am one of those that likes to pander and post nonsense to get plaudits while unable to contribute anything of substance nor understand it when it is staring me in the face. Hence my inane post.

The nearly 30,000 deaths per year in the United States due to firearms through both homocide and suicide is obviously an "acceptable loss", if there are people willing to defend gun ownership so virulently.