Accused

Is this the right room for an arugment [sic]? :p

No it bloomin' well isn't! :mad:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr Jan Yeo

This thread is an example of some beautiful interneting, chaps. Love how we've moved from TV programme to TV license to benefit cheats to tax dodgers and finally got to child abuse. Loving your work.

---

Here is where it went astray

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

Enjoy it while it lasts, your beloved Conservatives are sowing the seeds of its demise. :(

---

Seems nobody actually watched Accused, shame as it was cracking tele

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

All we need to do now is slag off Alonso / Hamilton / Schumacher (delete as appropriate) and we're good to go :D

---

But why, all are fine drivers - unlike the likes of Webber and Jacques Villeneuve who are both pretty crap

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dave B

I too read The Guardian, along with The Telegraph, The Independent and The Daily Mail; as well as taking a feed of headlines from the other major papers which occasionally pique my interest. I'd be most interested to know if I'm suitable to work with children. :p

---

Good that you look at so many, I find the Guardian and Independent wind me up too much with their champagne socialist agendas.

Wanting to believe scumbag parents would be more of an issue than which paper you read, but believing the Guardian would show that you're not very good at detecting lies, which if you were a social worker would be a bad asset.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight

Wanting to believe scumbag parents would be more of an issue than which paper you read, but believing the Guardian would show that you're not very good at detecting lies, which if you were a social worker would be a bad asset.

---

I will ask you again. Do you genuinely believe that I, as a Guardian reader, should not be allowed around children because I pose a danger to them? It is quite rude not to answer when a specific question is put, especially given the nature of your comments.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight

Good that you look at so many, I find the Guardian and Independent wind me up too much with their champagne socialist agendas.

Wanting to believe scumbag parents would be more of an issue than which paper you read, but believing the Guardian would show that you're not very good at detecting lies, which if you were a social worker would be a bad asset.

---

I don't believe you read The Guardian beyond perhaps scanning the headlines. If you'd like to browse their Comment Is Free section you'll find plenty of comment from what could be termed as the right-wing plus - especially since The Times put up a paywall - a lot of BTL comment from Conservative supporters. Hardly the preserve of the champagne swillers.

Edit: as I type, 2 of the 5 top-viewed CiF contributions are a largely critical piece on Obama, and a harsh look at the views of liberal hero Liu Xiaobo. Socialist agenda? Don't think so!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/pa...hock-and-anger

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/pa...s-will-be-lost

Just two articles at random from their front page

where does it say these cuts are necessary
where does it say that the private sector has already faced far bigger cuts
where does it say that Labour increased the size of the public sector far too much just in order to buy votes and massage the unemployment figures
where does it say that 25% of the public sector is made up of worthless non jobs that nobody would miss

it doesn't

QED the Guardian has an agenda and is full of ****

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bolton Midnight

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/pa...hock-and-anger

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/pa...s-will-be-lost

Just two articles at random from their front page

where does it say these cuts are necessary
where does it say that the private sector has already faced far bigger cuts
where does it say that Labour increased the size of the public sector far too much just in order to buy votes and massage the unemployment figures
where does it say that 25% of the public sector is made up of worthless non jobs that nobody would miss

it doesn't

QED the Guardian has an agenda and is full of ****

---

Such depth of analysis.

Sometimes no analysis is required. The Guardian is left of center. Heck, they take pride in that. Nothing wrong with it either. I know when I read the Guardian, that is the slant they put on the news, just like I know when I read the Wall Street Journal they will have their slant, the Toronto Star will lean to its leftist slant, or the Times of London will be Center right.

Newspapers have always had idealogical slants and news they tend to highlight. It is the way of the world. Somehow though, people always get bent out of shape when people point out the paper THEY like may have a bias.