I agree :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by skc
Printable View
I agree :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by skc
The way Fred got the inters to work all the way to the end of the race, I think there was a high probability that He would have passed both The Boss and Massa on merit in the closing stages of the race. Although It's hard to gage Massa's late race pace as he had probably turned the wick down. But with his tyre situation Hamilton was a dead duck :arrowed:Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
And Felipe Baby is already on Engine #9
:s ailor: #9 #9 #9 #9... Lennon and McCartney on acid :burn:
You may draw a conclusion without a shred of evidence to support it if you so wish.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Until Mr Hughes provides the transcript of the radio message telling Massa to back off, so by proving that Ferrari told him to do so, then I will treat his claim with the contempt it deserves.
:s ailor: Don't start going mental!Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Who ever wins the wdc will deserve it!! that's fair to say with only 2 races to go!
:grenade:
:grenade:
:grenade: :love:
I think everyone is entitled to their own pov, this isn't about I agree or disagree, in wet Felipe might struggle and by its nature drives a bit slow..
He was excellent in Interlagos 2008. Did everything he could.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjuna
Why so touchy? No-one has a problem with Massa being asked to help his team leader in the way Mark Hughes has evidenced because Ferrari have made clear that Alonso is their #1 and they are doing everything they can to aid his fight for the title.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
Exactly. Stupid rule.
Until I see the second driver actively blocking a championship competetor with dangerous or prohibited blocking moves, I could casre less about team orders. Build a faster car, it won't be a problem.
Because stronzo journalism should have no credibility given to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1