you poor souls are getting overrun and just can't come to grips with it. You may as well just go in to the "towel" business.
Printable View
you poor souls are getting overrun and just can't come to grips with it. You may as well just go in to the "towel" business.
Foustina, I got a chain letter as well, thought you might enjoy this although you may have already seen it, but even if you have it's good for another read.
It proves how north america was a much better place before all you immigrants arrived. :p :
Where White Man Went Wrong
Indian Chief Two Eagles was asked by a white government official, "You have observed the white man for 90 years. You've seen his wars and his technological advances. You've seen his progress, and the damage he's done."
The Chief nodded in agreement. The official continued, "Considering all these events, in your opinion, where did the white man go wrong?"
The Chief stared at the government official for over a minute and then calmly replied. "When white man find land, Indians running it, no taxes, no debt, plenty buffalo, plenty beaver, clean water. Women did all the work, Medicine man free. Indian man spend all day hunting and fishing; all night having sex."
Then the chief leaned back and smiled. "Only white man dumb enough to think he can improve system like that!"
http://www.businesspundit.com/where-...en-went-wrong/
Cameltoe A lot of truth in that. But look at this great heritage in Euro that is getting thrown under the bus. And I din't know that you are so safe down there.
Property law, I believe, is another reason. I don't consider any of this to be a particular threat to anyone or anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brown, Jon Brow
It is nice to read that, in holding your decidedly racist view about Muslims in Europe, you are lining yourself up alongside the opinions held by such a mentally stable, greatly respected world figure as... Colonel Gadaffi.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11139345
So if "all parties" agreed that it is OK to punish a woman for wearing lipstick by "PUBLIC" flogging you are OK with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
And how are we to decide who is OK with that? A woman living in fear of having her children taken away if she doesn't agree is suppose to have her consent taken at face value?
We were talking about the Sharia law, not about wearing lipstick. You don't know anything about the Sharia law. Not even the Muslims agree what it is and how it should be interpreted. Or can you give me a quote from the Sharia law that talks about lipstick and is agreed by all Muslims?Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Pick whatever violation you want under "Sharia" law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
Are you OK with it even though one of the parties involved might be accepting under duress?
Like I said, coercion can also occur under "normal" law. No system is perfect. "Might be" is not enough a reason to dismiss it. Innocent until proven guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
A couple of points.
Try living in any Muslim country where Sharia law is practiced and ask for either common law or civil law (French) in a dispute and see how far you get.
Secondly if you come into my country as an immigrant or refugee I expect you to live under my country's laws. If you find my country and its laws unacceptable to you, get the heck out. You came here of your own free will knowing the kind of law practised here, or you should have.
Two sets of laws for different people is not going to work.
Slightly off topic but Canada has had several so called honour killings, which I and our Courts call murder. These are not by any means all Muslims.
One recent case was because a teen age girl wanted to dress like her school mates. Her father and brother were convicted of murder. They openly confessed to the murder because the girl had 'dishonoured' the family!