I don't mind about the score, the most important fact is that both top teams have used tactics, admitting that those are necessary in a fight for the win. This ends all discussion about Citroen's moral superiority.
Printable View
I don't mind about the score, the most important fact is that both top teams have used tactics, admitting that those are necessary in a fight for the win. This ends all discussion about Citroen's moral superiority.
I hate the FIA! If they dont change the rule for next year i wont follow any gravel events!
I dont know who's the idiot that though this year running order was a good idea, but the guy should be nailed to tommorow's front runner car bumper and use as a sweeper!
Tactics are part of the game, that is why FIA has been testing with starting orders!!
Unfortunately there is no good solution for the sweeping problem, both running orders have their inherent problem...
as estimated, all 4 in 15 seconds for tomorrow!
But still, some solution should be find, because otherwise it will become total comedy. Popcorns and sweet candies will be selled to crews before finish of last stage on 2nd day during waiting for better road position :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by jonkka
I n the "good old days" it was the dust, running first could be a big advantage, except un New Zealand (obviously speaking about gravel).
It is part of rallying.
Running 2nd also let you (well let "them") see the driving lines and copy or risk a little more and so on.
It is part of the spirit of rallying!
Do you actualy think that driving to split, like it was in the past years, is not better than the comedy we see this year?Quote:
Originally Posted by jonkka
It's easy to say but much harder to find that solution.Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
now it looks like Novikov missing, PWRC is loosing the main contenders to Prokov (good for him as the fight has been at the second!!)