Allowing bigger restrictors to R5 cars was one of the biggest fails. Everywhere...
Printable View
Just think back to when R5 cars were introduced. It took years before anybody in the UK ran one - even though they were encouraged by the BRC organisers. What else would you as a governing body have done to encourage them?
There were huge outcries when cars like Andy Burton's and Kim Mather's were outlawed. As a governing body, how would you write the regulations to stop the use of oversized restrictors on R5/Rally2 cars without banning lots of other "home brewed" cars?
You might not like it as spectators but the sport is about what the competitors want and if they want to run Mk2 Escorts with Millington engines or R5 cars with WRC sized restrictors then why should they be stopped?
To make the cars slower doesnt cost load of money. It is exactly opposite - as these cars were build for current R5 rules, any other change (like bigger restrictor) makes them more powerful, but also less reliable as parts were designed for exact power. So with bigger restrictor you are paying more money to keep the car running on the equal quality...