Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
If you mean geographically closer then it really leaves Denmark Norway and Finland. of these three Finland would seam the most obvious. I think (and again sorry if the dates are out) Sweden annexed Finland in the 12th or 13th century and ruled until about 200 years ago, many towns and provinces would have coats of arms going back to that time, so Finland would be a complete, but hopefully not completely uneducated guess. As for the province, I don't have the faintest idea I can't even tell you what province Helsinki is in! All I know that Lapland is in the North, but is not a Finnish province as it also stretches across Sweden, Norway and Russia. And the Fins call FInland Soumi
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Yeah Finally Anfield, Finland is correct.
Province is called Finland Proper (Finnish: Varsinais-Suomi, Swedish: Egentliga Finland)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finland_Pr ... rovince%29
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleAivano
It's good we finally finished that one, :D
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
...It's good we finally finished that one, :D
Boo! :p:
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Type
One of the provinces in Northern Germany that was once part of the Swedish Empire.
Part of Pomerania was Swedish for a century or so. The city of Stargard seems to be one of the few places to have kept its name after becoming part of Poland. Just about everything else in the area was renamed.
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Quote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
...It's good we finally finished that one, :D
Boo! :p:
Poo :stare:
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Sorry about the delay in asking a new question (I was away from a computer all weekend)
Question:
Where in the world is this
http://fightingtheboredom.com/wp-con...ad-20-5291.jpg
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]
Re: How Good Is Your Geographic? [5]