Out of interest, do you actually know what culminated in Hamilton being on this "crap" line through the corner?Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
Printable View
Out of interest, do you actually know what culminated in Hamilton being on this "crap" line through the corner?Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
There was not enough room, it was a split second decision, and no racing driver making a split second decision will park the car simply so they can go through the corner without ploughing into the other cars sidepod, when they can cut across the chicane and then concede their position, to make it fair.Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicpanda
Perhaps that's what Kimi expected him to do, which might explain why he didn't really defend at La Source allowing Hamilton to make a great move on the brakes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
I do think that Kimi's poor defence at La Source, and Hamilton's ability on the brakes, contributed to there being a penalty awarded against Hamilton. Had the McLaren not got through at the hairpin then there may have been no penalty at all IMHO.
Hamilton did not stay on the circuit, he took a shortcut through asphalt that was not included int the racetrack, so the move was overambitious. My point again, can you use parts not included in the racetrack to your advantage when trying to pass people? Obviously it was a split second call but still Hamilton should have slowed down a lot more when letting Kimi pass.Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
But Hamilton clearly conceded the position negating the advantage he made by cutting the corner, Schumacher did not.Quote:
Originally Posted by tinchote
Why? AFAIK there is nothing in the regs to specify how much a driver has to slow down by, just as there is nothing to say when he is allowed to challenge for position again.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Hamilton cut the chicane, got ahead of Kimi as a result, and immediately allowed the Ferrari to regain the position as he was required to do. That's it.
I did... he said this:Quote:
Originally Posted by mstillhere
IMMA CHARGIN MAH LAZER!Quote:
That was my immediate opinion after seeing the replay.
I'm sure there is a regulation about closed circuits and how in a race the winner is the one who completes the designated circuit fastest? Hamilton went off the designated circuit in a place where it's quicker to go straight through off the circuit than take the chicane and after that he didn't back off enough to negate the time-gain he got in relation to Räikkönen from short-cutting the chicane. Letting Kimi pass wasn't enough because had Hamilton made it through the chicane behind Kimi, he wouldn't have been so close behind at the start/finish line. The regulations are vague, that's probably one of the reasons that caused the incident, also circuit design should not allow people to take short cuts in high, or even moderate speeds.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
well yes..why no punishment for all the drivers goin of the track at the start - first corner?..gaining advantage by doin so..keeping up speed..instead of hitting the breaks and following the racetrack...Fe like Kimi..if he would have hit the breaks like Lewis should have donne according to some on here..he would never been so close behind Massa..Or if there would have been a concrete wall he would have been out of the race....that's what I learned here over the past couple of days right ?Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
For those who wanne see what I mean
http://media.vrtnieuws.net/2008/09/1...0154_wmvhi.wmv
http://images.theage.com.au/ftage/ff..._470x416,2.jpg
www.f1-live.com/f1/img/regulations/2008sport_en.pdf
Quote:
30.3 a) During practice and the race, drivers may use only the track and must at all times observe the
provisions of the Code relating to driving behaviour on circuits.
b) Other than by driving on the track, Competitors are not permitted to attempt to alter the grip of any
part of the track surface.