I know this is OT but how. If anything it shows him as strong president that is doing the best for the sport, not best for the promoter.
But I hope he will also start to do that in WRC.
Printable View
As much as 80% of the current Rally1 car will remain unchanged when the World Rally Championship introduces new technical regulations for 2027, according to the FIA.
https://www.motorsport.com/wrc/news/...ions/10546298/
Sent from my SM-A705FN using Tapatalk
IMHO the technically easiest solution for a new WRC car, which could be atrractive for the current and new manufacturers, is an EV with CE working as a generator. That concept is known for more than 120 years, it works in many applications and was even used by Audi in Dakar. IMHO with well thought-out rules such cars are much easier and likely cheaper to build than the current ones. You have no gearbox, no super duper racing engine and you don't need large heavy batteries either. On top of that you have an easy way to control torque distribution even without using differentials.
Yes, it's something new and it won't sound like today's car but WRC needs something new. It badly needs something new.
So in princip the same concept as this one
https://www.google.com/search?q=opel...xEpRYTCIM&ip=1
Yes like the Opel Ampera.
While it's a feasible way to get "electric vehicles" competitive in rallying, a serial Hybrid is technically a very bad solution in general. If the people/politics/media would be able to understand what they are lobbying for they'd be very upset that "their' BEV Dakar Audi is just a very inefficient Hybrid with a "evil" ICE.
Hm might be different in competition but for road cars it was less efficient than a comparable parallel hybrid, an Ampera in normal running was said to use between 7 and 9 liters per 100 km for example.
Presumably the fuel consumption of the Audi was with a pre charged battery?
Do you happen to know the approximate fuel consumption of a T1+ Toyota/BRX/...?