Ok NOT :)
Printable View
Ok NOT :)
please bare in mind that VW has as a goal to win rallies and championships not to waste money or hire 5 year plan miracle boys....so please use these facts before popping the first name that comes to your head....Quote:
Originally Posted by r199
No1 driver should be someone who is a proved winner...No2 someone who has the potential to win in 2 years and maybe then 1-2 cars to drivers who need to prove a lot of things before advancing.
Hirvonen is driving well if there is still damage in his car.
I don't know, but there's no guarantee that's the problem, is there? 'Engine' and 'cylinder' could mean just about anything. 'Spun bearing,' 'detonation' or 'no spark' would be more specific, but I don't think we've heard anything this definite.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
loeb is the only proved winner richt now, so think next year he should drive for Citroen Ford Vw and Mini, so thay all have a chance to become world champion
is Hanninen out?
edit: his time after splits he shoed be 19th :(
edit 2: Hanninen has 13.44 on splits, Weijs 13.42 and Riedeman 14.00. but in eWRC standings Riedeman has also 13.42. which is the right standing?
Loeb building on a lead... Ogier i think should accept his fate or take risks and jeopardise the second palce in this years championship.
no Alleskids, 2 seconden achter hans op ss5
2010 2nd pass: Sordo:12:01.3, Loeb: 12:02.0Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
2011 2nd pass: Loeb: 12:01.9
I don't remember if there were rain last year, but this morning, I suspect it was humid.
he finished stage 5 5 seconds slower than Tanak and 2 behind WiesjQuote:
Originally Posted by alleskids