That's no problem. Fabia is originally only 1642 mm wide. It's in fact better for smaller front area.
Printable View
That's no problem. Fabia is originally only 1642 mm wide. It's in fact better for smaller front area.
Maybe because there's no tunnel for the transmission in the Clubman.
marcus testing, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sF_75...eature=related
fastest driver so far IMO
meeke will be faster on a rally...Quote:
Originally Posted by jonas_mcrae
atleast he should be, if he cant beat an old driver who has not been driving seriously for years, he is not much of a driver. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by RJM
Your 100% right, if meeke has a future in the wrc he needs to beat gronholm.
That’s no problem. They can make modifications to the bodyshell that enables 4WD in the same manner as in WRC, S2000 and rallycross.Quote:
Originally Posted by JRodrigues
At the beginning of page 6.
http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public.nsf/8C150505AAC84F05C1257690004AEBA2/$FILE/279%20(10-11).pdf
I guess none of the WRCars or S2000s, apart from the two GrN manufacturers, are based on a 4WD car - so I think that is not an issue.
But the old GrA cars all were, and we had a lot of nice roadcars as a result !!
Not a bad spinoff at all ! ;)
So is the Super Production MINI for R4 regs?
Yes GpA (R categories now) is the best way forward, as manufacturer will make performance road cars as that is the only way to rally that model.
Now we have Ford and Citroen who dont know 4WD for road cars competing with 4WD for rallying. Disapprove.
There are no existing R4 regs. WRC commission hasn't discuss them yet. There is only proposal, which is still long way from regulations.Quote:
Originally Posted by navtheace
Regarding 4WD cars it's true only in nice dreams, not in current reality on car market. But of course I agree about 2WD cars where gr.R is definitely good choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by navtheace