The purpose of the 9/11 attacks were twofold:Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
1. Target and kill Americans, and;
2. Cripple the U.S. economy.
Al Qaeda accomplished both.
Printable View
The purpose of the 9/11 attacks were twofold:Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
1. Target and kill Americans, and;
2. Cripple the U.S. economy.
Al Qaeda accomplished both.
I dispute the ridiculous numbers of casualties. Take off a few zerosQuote:
Originally Posted by Rollo
I didn't invent the term.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo
The survival of US citizens....YES. Of course you have made it painfully obvious that your blind jealousy condones the deaths of innocent Americans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
Defending its citizens, and those who are our allies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
IMO it's the anti-American propagangda which is extremely powerful...Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Why just those? Why not all people, or at least innocent people? Why must innocent people in other parts of the world die so that innocent Americans can live?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Riebe
Pakistan is a US ally. Yet the US has caused "collateral damage" in Pakistan. Would you accept if the British, the Pakistanis or other US allies bombed targets in the US causing "collateral damage"?
Such a scenario is silly, but as you are using an analogy that is void of content, if you are speaking of a David Koresh, Waco, Tx. type scenario, yes there the U.S. govt. should have been charged with murder or at least manslaughter, but he who wins the war, makes the history and that was old news before how barbaric Pres. Clinton's actions were, became common knowledge .Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
Had Koresh been a truly violent and dangerous force, those that died with him then, would have paid the penalty of sleeping with the devil. Innocence be damned.
If you dispute them, then please provide a reliable link that you do trust.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
No, but you do endorse the term, agree with it and seemingly approve of it. It still doesn't change your attitude does it? You still choose to hold no value of these people.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
1. An ability to make a point cannot be 'vacuous'. One would never say that somebody has a 'vacuous ability' to make a point. A lack of ability, or similar, perhaps, but there is no such phrase as 'vacuous ability'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Riebe
2. '...cannot defend you seeming rhetoric'? Pardon?
If you are to criticise the ability of others in making points, at least do so in a way that makes proper grammatical sense.
And Americans are the epitome of society? A country where KuKluxKlan is protected by police while they're demonstrating hate,racism etc. What a BS attempt to devalue the lives of the innocent that have died.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Riebe