Highlights only? Bristol? Are you sure? :eek:
Printable View
Highlights only? Bristol? Are you sure? :eek:
FreeWayBill, The fact is NASCAR fans got more coverage on NASN than on Sky. So why did Sky Sports out bid NASN if they were not serious about OUR sport?
And NASN still shows more NASCAR coverage than Sky. Could not do without NASN.Quote:
Originally Posted by NASCAR8
Considering new Bristol is a big pile of ****.
Not having the race LIVE isn't a big loss. A1GP @ Mexico will be much better to watch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedworx
Ouch - can't say I agree with you there
I think the problem at bristol last year was the tyre. same thing as atlanta this year just way too hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedworx
Do you know that NASN made a bid??Quote:
Originally Posted by NASCAR8
NASN can't be arsed to show the Nationwide series live anymore, nor can they be bothered to screen NASCAR Now (I guess because all NASCAR fans have pretty much cancelled).
Then we get SKY deciding not to show NASCAR live at Bristol. Not good enough.
i'll live with the "not live" showing for bristol. it's usually a crash fest and while that can be entertaining , sitting through the endless caution laps isn't.
a1gp season finishes soon (and the remaining races don't clash) so the rest of the nascar season should be shown live i would think.
Any clashes with the IRL/INDY/Champ/Whatever races?Quote:
Originally Posted by acorn