Or this one - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NcngaZZpNI Look at 0:56 - 16 (sixteen!) on ground cameras per 7km.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLuto
Printable View
Or this one - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NcngaZZpNI Look at 0:56 - 16 (sixteen!) on ground cameras per 7km.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLuto
It's not like we have a choice. It is WRC+ or really nothing else. But I do wish they would learn to advertise correctly and deliver on their responsibilities. Just watched a 'Preview Magazine - Mexico'. The piece was 25:51 long and there was nothing about Mexico until it reached 16:15. All that other crap should have been in a different video.
true...they could and should have put more content about Mexico in it.Quote:
Originally Posted by litifeta
Looks like we're forced to subscribe to WRC+ if we want to see the onboards..
WRC+ now with WRC2 maps.
http://www.wrc.com/en/wrc/news/march...4--12-12-.html
Also as promo for Rally Mexico, WRC+ to try for €0.99.
this is great! i have always liked wrc+ although i agree that it could be a lot better. But they are making steps!
And WRC2 footage on the live stage and shown in the WRC+ highlights, isn't that a first?
Let's be realistic, that's probably only because the WRC field was so tame in Mexico.
They're going to go back to the old standard again as soon as we go back to an easy to reach event
That video is revealing in so many ways. The WRC has gone so far backwards as a series since then, and accordingly, there just isn't the level of interest that there was 17 years ago, which is partly why we are stuck with shite like WRC+.Quote:
Originally Posted by PLuto
You're not 'stuck' with anything. WRC+ is there if you want it, otherwise there is TV and other online access for free.Quote:
Originally Posted by RAS007
It should be noted that this live from 1998 was on pay-tv Canal+ as well.
I'm sure there were people complaining about that fact back then too...