Printable View
I don't understand the constant criticsm of Eurosport for "chasing money". The championship costs money to run and they are not a charity. It would be lovely if we could choose a calendar based solely on romantic ideas but we live in the real world.
We still have some great and classic rallies in there though; Sanremo and Corsica, some 'modern classics' (Ypres and Barum), we would have Monte Carlo too if it weren't for ACM in my opinion making the wrong decision a couple of years ago...
stages are wonderful. very fast. not breaker. no damage to car. wash the car and go to home.Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgi
gravel drivers love and also tarmac drivers love the stages.
used at 2007 IRC, 2008 IRC, 2009 ERC, 2010 WRC, 2011 ERC and 2012 ERC ;)
This article is made on basis of info in this forum...Quote:
Originally Posted by muratgunarslan
Yes. And it happens quite often :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PLuto
And in this real world, does anybody need ERC consisting of 13 rounds?Quote:
Originally Posted by RS
I think that ideal number should be 7-8 events. But it is about money...Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarek Z
Yes, I support the idea of a strong championship with 8 rounds.
Counting the best 6 results from 8 rallies.
Kubica is very close to signing a deal with M-Sport.
Very good news ! Interesting entry into the serious European rallying.Quote:
Originally Posted by EightGear
If it was 8 rallies I would make all 8 count. Not keen on dropped scores only because they make it difficult for the average man on the street to understand championship standings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgi