Osama Bin Laden Is Dead

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

9th May 2011, 19:57
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eki

And even more innocent civilians have been killed in Iraq and in Lebanon and Palestine.

Well Saddam is gone and so is Arafat, so it is not nearly so bad now.
9th May 2011, 19:59
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave B

"One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist".

Yes they fight for what they believe in unlike the pantywaist liberals in the U.S. so one must respect them for honoring their faith, and absolutely kill them first.
9th May 2011, 20:01
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eki

Sure they are. They are supposed to improve their counter-terrorism intelligence and border security, and check their policies if there's something they could do that so many people weren't so pissed off by their actions.

If in your country the police is looking for a murderer, do they blow up apartment buildings and schools full of innocent bystanders where the suspect might or might not be hiding? Or should they wait until they get him without killing any innocent bystanders?

Your bogus trolling analogies are still asinine and numerous.
9th May 2011, 20:18
Eki

Quote:

Originally Posted by anthonyvop

Are you serious? Really? Are you actually being serious by that statement?
Please tell me it is some kind of weird, quirky, Finnish humor that I don't get.

The US didn't care there were innocent bystanders in the towers in Lebanon, Bin Laden didn't care there were innocent bystanders in the WTC towers. Where's the difference?
9th May 2011, 21:39
anthonyvop

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eki

The US didn't care there were innocent bystanders in the towers in Lebanon, Bin Laden didn't care there were innocent bystanders in the WTC towers. Where's the difference?

You are sick.
9th May 2011, 21:52
JackSparrow

Quote:

Originally Posted by anthonyvop

While I dispute those numbers I will point out one simple fact that you seem to have missed.

The 3000 people murdered on 9/11 were targeted. Any innocent civilian that maybe was killed in Afghanistan weren't. Collateral damage is the ugly side of war but no country has done more to prevent it than the USA.....NOBODY!!!

Are you being serious? You're not any better than Bin Laden with that thinking.
If they wanted to kill people there are simpler ways to do so.Timothy McVeigh killed 400 with a cargo van.
9th May 2011, 21:58
JackSparrow

The US is the only country that has dropped atom bombs on cities :( I'm sure there was no collateral damage done :rolleyes:
9th May 2011, 22:05
Daniel

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackSparrow

The US is the only country that has dropped atom bombs on cities :( I'm sure there was no collateral damage done :rolleyes:

Call a waaaaaahmbulance. Anyone with half a braincell knows why they did that rather than attempt to invade.
9th May 2011, 22:45
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by henners88

I think theres a little more to it than that, and before we start insinuating each other have foolish judgements it might be worth analysing events with a little more depth. Your opinion of me makes absolutely no difference whatsoever.

Nor does it make your analogy any less silly at face value. (Foolish is a bit too harsh)
There is nothing to relate the two.
Some here roll out the same trolling topics, not related to the thread topic, always attacking others opinions never rarely if ever defending their own.

Standard operating mode for trolling.
9th May 2011, 22:47
Bob Riebe

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackSparrow

The US is the only country that has dropped atom bombs on cities.

So what is your point, if you have one?

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page