Printable View
Win for Renault (sorry I will always refuse to call them Lotus) but for Grosjean. He is due. He appears to have learnt how not to collide with anyone close enough at the start and he is looking seriously fast.
He has out qualified Kimi in 2 of the last three and was next to him on the grid in the other race, was 3 rd in Germany, 1 place behind Kimi (team orders to explain this) and was really unlucky to be penalised for his move on Massa in Hungary
Like taking an overweight diabetic kid of a candy store and uttering the words "all you can eat"... :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Alca-Tazizzle
It's important not to forget that the rain can appear at any time in the Ardennes.
We haven't had a wet race yet, so predictions for a rain-soaked competition are just guess-estimates.
Given the Mercedes has good front grip, the rain should suit them.
For Ferrari, we need Mister Blue Sky
ELO? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Parabolica
Elo yourself, how are you? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
Tactically, Ferrari need to keep their options open, to treat the race like a Living Thing, such a terrible thing to lose.
It is the driest year ever in Belgium this year, even in Spa.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parabolica
Having worked at Spa before, I know that the Ardennes region has a micro-climate weather system all of its own. It can be dry in the paddock, and have rain of biblical proportions at Blanchimont. I take your word for it that Belgium is drier than ever. I just think that Spa is Spa.
The weather forecast I looked at seemed to suggest there was at least a chance of some rain in the region on Sunday
Sent from North Korea using the dark network
You can never tell with SPA. Personally, I would love to see a dry race, but if it rains I won't complain :)