Printable View
You might have want to read again my post to Arrows.Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
Arrows was laughing about a very realistic point, while I am laughing about a very laughable suggestion.
BTW do you know who posted the fastest lap of the race?
:laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Try guessing what I'm laughing about now :p ;)
Ioan, be mature.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Explain yourself. Back up what you say.
What is laughable about the fact Hamilton was simply not as quick as Alonso over the course of a race distance?
I'm not denying the fact that Alonso benefitted from the fact Hamilton held up the Ferrari. I find it strange you find it 'laughable' for me to believe Hamilton (1 F1 GP experience) was simply not a match for Alonso (2 x WC).
I find it strange to see Ferrari/Michael fans going on about team order's 2 races after Michael has retired. As I said in another topic, Jean Todt seemed embarassed by it!
PS: Also notice how Hamilton was 1sec a lap slower than Alonso in the final stint. Why on earth would he have done that on purpose? All it resulted in was he was put under immense pressure from Kimi. At the end of the day Hamilton wasn't as quick as Alonso over the course of a race distance. It really isn't that absurb of a thing to admit!!
:rolleyes: :p :Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
OK, let's see, what you first said:Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
He wasn't holding them up? Are you kidding or you really believe it? Hamilton was the fastest out there Sunday, but team orders are team orders (and I have nothing against them given that I am a Ferrari fan), and he had to make sure that FA was clear before he upped his pace.Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
Of course he wasn't as fast as Alonso over the, cause he had to lose time at the beginning playing "Barichello"!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
I see where this is coming from. It's your lack of understanding of the English language which has thrown you.
I said Hamilton wasn't holding back the Ferraris by compromising his race (in other words, more simple words, just for you - he wasn't driving slower than what he could achieve).
As I pointed out, the last stint again Hamilton couldn't keep up to Alonso's pace.
Please read it properly before commenting on my posts, or just don't bother :)
I'm pretty sure he knows exactly what you're saying. I think he just disagrees with this:Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
And I question that a little as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
Don't worry I understand and speak English much better than you do Romanian, Hungarian, French, Italian and German (which I also do speak), so as I told you get of the high horse and discuss the threads subject not the members of the forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by raphael123
Race,
I do think Alonso has a great deal of talent and is without a doubt "for real". I also hope that McLaren gets back into the game with their cars holding up better. But, history shows us that what killed both Montoya and even worse Kimi was the fact that the engines kept going south.
I think it's too early to get the hopes up for a Mclaren season win. They already had capable drivers in past years, they simply didn't have capable engines.
The FIA took care of that limiting the engines revs to 90% of what the best could do last season ad to that the engine development freeze and Mercedes are on a level playing field with the rest of them for the first time since 2000.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter