We are men-on-internet. How dare you question our collective authoritah?? :devil: :pQuote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
Printable View
We are men-on-internet. How dare you question our collective authoritah?? :devil: :pQuote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
Surely this is a bad idea :pQuote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
Steven Seagal Training Sheriff Joe Arpaio
It's a case of deciding which is the bigger problem once you take the other away. For example if you took away mentally disturbed people you would still have vengeful and stupid people capable of using guns. You take away guns and you're still left with mentally disturbed people, vengeful people and stupid people, it's just that they have to resort to knives/bats/bricks etc. etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Starter
I do think that the US gets quite a hard time over their gun laws/opinions/statistics, although there is no doubt in my mind that a large amount of it is deserved. This article has an interesting table at the bottom. If you sort the data by % of homicides by firearm then there are some surprising results. There are predictably some third world and heavily cartel led countries near the top, but I didn't expect Switzerland and Italy to be so high up the table.
Gun homicides and gun ownership listed by country | News | guardian.co.uk
Might be because it is the easiest solution, but it is not the best.Quote:
Originally Posted by schmenke
Probably to much effort to make the changes needed to rid America of its gun culture. Politicians are just like most others. Try the easiest solution before the most effective.
Much like the fantasy that simply putting some words on a piece of paper (i.e. a law which is no more enforceable than the ones we already have) would cure this problem, this is also a knee-jerk reaction, only from the the pro-gun crowd instead of the pro-gun control crowd. Having been well versed in firearms for most of my time on this planet, I know that putting a firearm in the hands of an untrained person, and thinking that person is going to be able to handle a fire fight or a tense situation, is like giving a machine gun to a baby. Sure, he'll be able to fire it. But the results may be problematic, if not tragic.
Stupid idea.
Great points Jag, and the article does in fact mention a training program that has oversight by a law enforcement commission. Hopefully they at least give the proper training.
You guy act like teachers don't already bring guns with them. I know many teachers and I know that many of them who teach in "rougher" neighborhoods carry guns with them.
Perhaps a gun issued to every new born is the way to go. Of course, you must ensure all parents pack iron to ensure safety.
Oh he'll, I've figured out I really don't care anymore. Let the yanks do what they want. I only have to spend a week or two there each year so let them get on with it.
My apathy gland has taken over and any desire to discuss this rationally, again, has flown out the window
I'm glad that you have finally accepted that our country won't be influenced much by internet discussions. The reality is that every country does stupid things at time, and in this instance it hasn't yet even proven to be stupid. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Why don't we arm the kids as well? In case the teacher turns on their class. Only safe thing to do IMO.