i would not be surprised to find out that that's what the fight was aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
do not forget the blackmail a few years ago
the picture of him and the other f1 driver hand in hand
rumors ?
Printable View
i would not be surprised to find out that that's what the fight was aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
do not forget the blackmail a few years ago
the picture of him and the other f1 driver hand in hand
rumors ?
going on from your post in the Islam thread - could you provide a list of all the men you've been in, so we can judge the validity of your opinion regarding homosexuality? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
You missed out somebody posting a duplicate thread which they were writing at the same time, and then somebody else posting another duplicate thread a few hours or days later because they didn't bother scrolling down a few lines :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Mark
this image may be a fakeQuote:
Originally Posted by henners88
http://i40.tinypic.com/k50l8l.jpg
Oh I've tried reasoned debate and it never works on this particular forum for some reason. Sometimes it's fun to join in the nonsensical rubbish that goes on here (see above posts for an utterly crass example) Some of it truely priceless, especially to those of us who have worked for many years in F1, Indycar, BTCC, and factory Le Mans efforts. Carry on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koz
:up: Even Michael Schumacher brought funding to his first Jordan outing. It's the way of motorsport. As for Sir Frank only being there to make up the numbers, well, that's certainly the impression you'd get if you never looked beyond the results, but I doubt for one moment that his passion is any less that it was when he had the likes of Jones, Prost, or Mansell on his books.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
He surely does recognise, however, that his team needs to be first and foremost a viable business. As far as I know Williams have always made an operating profit, which over the decades is a remarkable achievment. There's no point paying millions to employees if it drives your team into bankrupcy. It's true that as their on-track performance dipped they were deserted by sponsors, which drives a vicious circle with less money to spend on performance. They'll need to up their game on track - 2011 was an unmitigated disaster for them - or a stroke of luck with some rich sponsors investing in the outfit, which is where their drivers' backers come in. Invest that money wisely and hopefully the results will follow, and the vicious circle starts rotating in the opposite direction.
Santandar isn't a personal sponsor of Alonso's.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
Santander clearly want to associate with Alonso as they began sponsoring McLaren. Does that make him a pay driver?
Would they be at Ferrari if he were not? He has not directly brought the money to the team himself, but the money is with the team because he's racing for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Does that make him a pay driver? It's a fine definition to make because either way a sponsor is paying Ferrari and Williams money in return for having a certain driver in place.
Where exactly is your reasoned debate?Quote:
Originally Posted by shazbot
You posted something, I responded to it in a civilised manner. You didn't like it and resorted to sarcasm.
Now, you decided to tell me that you are some guy who has worked in motorsport "for many years" and we must bow down to your eternal wisdom because you say so?
Let me guess, asking you for proof will lead nowhere, am I right?
Yes, you are right about Sutil, there is very little time left take a risk.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1
But on the other cases, I would think the most important thing for Williams would be experience.
Wouldn't it be better to have drivers who have done a few seasons compared to someone who has not yet done one full season? (The GP2 experience of HRT does not count)
Especially when their other driver has also done only one season.