as a father and rallyefan i can maybe a little bit imagine how both sides feel....
my deepest condulences to the parents of the little girl and all the strengh for andreas and ole to recover from this tragedy
Printable View
as a father and rallyefan i can maybe a little bit imagine how both sides feel....
my deepest condulences to the parents of the little girl and all the strengh for andreas and ole to recover from this tragedy
I wish that never happened... :(
We had a couple of bad accidents in a short time period that was the reason to the decision, in one accident 2 spectators died and in one the codriver got really badly hurt, I don´t remember exactly what happend.Quote:
Originally Posted by Juha_Koo
After theese accidents the commision took the decision that we didn´t have tarmac-roads that could be save enough for spectators or team.
We have alot of small and very tight tarmac roads that could be suitable but there are absolutely no way to make a mistake cause you´ll end up in a tree very hard.
My opinion is that rally should be on gravel or snow and ice because you can loose control over the car in very particulars places that no one could see.
There is one more way of seeing it, in Sweden Norway and Finland the organisation don´t have experience of tarmac rally, that could allso have a roll in this accidents
It is very very sad, must be terrible for both sides.
But the driver cant be to blame, a lot of the blame should lie with the organisers. If the girl and her father were in a proper area, which it seems they were, then it should have been safe. I know any motorsport can have its risks, but generally when they set an area for spectators, it is overly safe.
Sad and tragic!
As others have hinted at...There was a very serious accident on a swedish tarmac rally involving deaths in the early 2000s. I dont remember specifics, but the stage was averaging 140km/h. As I recall the nail in coffin for swedish tarmac rallies. I would not stand near the road on a tarmac rally.. the point of direction can just snap change. And with the stiff low car it will not take kind to ditches and bumps on the outside of roads, making a recovery even more difficult.
I basically stop reading at websites with those kind of headlines. I haven't read crash.net for almost a year now since they like to make up craps.Quote:
Originally Posted by OldF
I hope this isn't a video of the accident?Quote:
Originally Posted by SubaruNorway
Of course it's not!Quote:
Originally Posted by Halvis
Sorry i didn't say what it was, it's just Østberg and Grøndal.
Truly dreadful accident. Hope those affected can come to terms with it eventually.Quote:
Originally Posted by JFL
Mikkelsen is compeletly blameless.
With respect to Mats Østberg, sitting in a chair, 2m from the road, 100m after a jump, is not a safe area.
If there is a quick approach for a junction, usually there is a requirement for at least 200m of an escape road. The danger area after a jump is at least 200m and a min' of 10m back from the road. Most experienced fans know this, they've witnessed these accidents before or seen the videos.
Tarmac is not the issue. Could easily happen on any surface if the jump area is not setup and run properly by the organisers.
Neither spectator or competitor rally safety is given the priority it should be with the FIA. Sadly it will take more than this for things to really change.
For starters, the fact that people can list off alot of accidents this year, following on from similar numbers of tragic accidents in recent years, is quiet shocking. In the aviation industry there is an awful phrase to describe this, tombstone technology. Only when enough people are killed will something be done.