Did anyone consider that, maybe, Vettel was simply faster and drove better than the rest of them?
Printable View
Did anyone consider that, maybe, Vettel was simply faster and drove better than the rest of them?
The kitty is astonished by your outside-the-box thinking.Quote:
Originally Posted by Valve Bounce
http://arnoldthemethodical.files.wor...astonished.jpg
Kovy didn't deliver. Let's move on folks, nothing to see here!
I find it a bit hard to criticize the driver who finished 2nd! It's not like he was stuck down in 17th - 20th! Give the guy a break!
No reason to criticise Kovi - he drove exceedingly well under difficult circumstances. However, to say he shoulda won is just plain nonsense - he was beaten in all respects by a better drive by Vettel in a Torro Rosso, no less.
Let's put this into perspective and stop the Shooda, cooda wooda jive.
Could be that the Toro Rosso was simply the vest car for the conditions. They qualified the best (1st and 4th) out of anyone as well.
Nah, it couldn't be that simple - we must spend pages of posts analyzing the race to find the real reason Vettel won. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
I've had enough of your well reasoned and unbiased posting. If you keep on like this I'm going to report you!!!! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
I think you should take into account Hamiltons blistering pace wasn't sustainable. He pushed it heavy on stint after, only to find he'd used his tyres and ended up being 1s + slower than Vettel.Quote:
Originally Posted by truefan72
Quote:
Originally Posted by PolePosition_1
That being said, the car was still more than a mtach for the STR ( I' can;t beleive I saying this..) and if Hamilton could find a way with a heavier fule load and a longer stint on ttyres to get up there then surely Kovy could have found a way past Vettel with a McLaren. I am pretty sure that if Hamilton was sitting Second he would have passed Vettel or at the veryworst given him a stiff challenge for the win.