It's not MatchboxQuote:
Originally Posted by TypeR
Printable View
It's not MatchboxQuote:
Originally Posted by TypeR
I hope they get involved more.Quote:
Originally Posted by mknight
But i have that hope for many years now, and it's always a dissapointment.
I don't think that's the livery we'll see in WRC...
For sure not.
Still, I hope they keep those rims, they look pretty mean imho.Quote:
Originally Posted by AnttiL
Anybody still thinks new Puma Rally1 was developed with M-Sport's (private team) money?Quote:
Originally Posted by denkimi
No. Ford Performance promised good support when new (Rally1 / Hybrid 2022) regulations were announced.
Ford wouldn't have involved more if the old regs (WRC2017) would have continued.
I didn't see anyone doubting that, definitely not after Goodwood this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by abcrally
What I and many others wonder is how can Ford, after using not insignificant ammount of money, be satisfied with MSport using Greensmith as #2 driver ( and to a lesser extend Breen as #1).
But hey, there is still hope they announce Tanak soon.
Ford paid and allowed the use of its PF facilities, but the mechanics and engineers at M-Sport did most the the actual work. They are the rally car manufacturer not Ford.Quote:
Originally Posted by abcrally
You don't get tired with the same story over again, huh..?Quote:
Originally Posted by mknight
You don't get tired with the MSport excuses on why they run a B team over again, huh..?Quote:
Originally Posted by TypeR