Looks like a Puma door hasn't yet closed for Mikkelsen...
https://mobile.twitter.com/anlauto/s...73848721432580
Printable View
Looks like a Puma door hasn't yet closed for Mikkelsen...
https://mobile.twitter.com/anlauto/s...73848721432580
Of course not. If you have money...Quote:
Originally Posted by macebig
Loeb to Ford appears to be a done deal. Programme TBD.
https://as.com/motor/2021/11/25/mas_...47_559529.html
The Puma testing car seems to have quite a lot of empty space in the wheelarches for tarmac spec car.
Could be for aero reasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by mknight
Yeah sure... If you want to have worse aero you make the gaps bigger, and the ride height taller;)Quote:
Originally Posted by becher
Haha, ride height and wheel arche design are not strictly related. An enclosed wheel arch that is not sufficiently vented produces a lot of lift, if the regulations don't allow for openings (see Yaris CD stack as a prime example) to vent the pressure, one solution is to make the gap between the wheel and the arch bigger (see TC1 cars from the WTCC). It might sound counter intuitiv, but a lot of aero stuff does.Quote:
Originally Posted by ictus
I guess they could find better solutions... such as the internal conduct at the rear of the new Toyota GR Yaris Rally1, an alternative to the CD stackQuote:
Originally Posted by becher
Attachment 2199
Quote:
Originally Posted by lluisva555
Yeah sure that can be a solution all though it is probably not a golden ticket in terms of drag either as its a bit of a bottel neck with a high pressure region somewhere. Also seems like a loophole they found as there was this talk about "no internal ducting"?