AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Kimi is/was the fastest man in F1. And his mental strenght, noone ever in F1 have come close to him.
Printable View
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Kimi is/was the fastest man in F1. And his mental strenght, noone ever in F1 have come close to him.
Hope not, Pirelli, IIRC, were unable to build tyres to last a race distance. Sure, for the 5 or so laps they held together they were blistering (scuse the pun), but races have rarely been run over only a handful of laps.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
I think Kimi got royally shafted at Ferrari. I do think Alonso would be the more successful out of the two because he's more of a b****rd. Kimi is Kimi.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
About the first year, I think Alonso learned a lesson. He tried to win by default instead of on the track. Then he tried to blacmail his team and eventually got handed a butt full of whoop ass.
These days, I feel that Hamilton will beat Alonso but they are pretty close. On par may be wrong but it's not the driving that will seperate them.
Still, all opinion.
Interesting that without German GP team orders Massa would be only 18 points behind Alonso. Actually I wanted to say that to me it seems like Massa has managed to raise his game since Valencia, being capable of more or less matching Alonso's pace. Shame he gave too much away in the first half of the season, so now he doesn't have much else to do than simply wait for 2011.
2011 will not change anything. Alonso is the number one driver and Massa will play second fiddle. That's just the strategy they've adopted, right or wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
In Australia or Malaysia Massa wasn't asked to move over, when the Ferrari drivers were still close in the standings. In the end #1 drivers are decided on track. Webber was considered to be a #2, but this doesn't prevent him from being the bigger title contender of the two RBR drivers.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
The difference being that Webber isn't racing against Santander, I mean Alonsita. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
ioan...the name is Alonso, do remember that !Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Fernando hadn't stamped his authority then, now he has.Quote:
Originally Posted by jens
Fernando hadn't stamped his foot and scweemed very loudly then, now he has. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Which is why he was signed, and what the money he is paid is for.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
And why this Tifoso is happy with the progress of the Scuderia with Alonso.
You're right it's the mighty cry baby 'let me through' Alonso, or shall we call him Mr. Wet Setup Alonso?Quote:
Originally Posted by pino
Whichever you prefer mighty pino.
I think I will call him Mr. MonzaQuote:
Originally Posted by ioan
want to bet big mouth!!!!!!
La Gazzetta Dello Sport readers were not happy after Spa, based on the numerous comments I read but I guess they're not Tifoso. But I agree, Alonso was signed to be the lead driver, it's just that he is not Michael Schumacher of 1996.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Are you sure....? Alonso 2010 seems to be just as successful as Schumacher 1996. I hope he's not going to be like the Schumacher 1997, Schumacher 1998, Schumacher 1999. That would be too much.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
I'd prefer 'The man that retired the man that retired Schumacher' Alonso.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Just what is the progress this year? Ferrari started off OK but since Massa got screwed, they look to be struggleing. Well, Alonso anyway. Massa was a bit demotivated but seems to be doing a Webber and proving himself even though the team are behind the other driver.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Considering the advantage Alonso has in the team, Massa isn't doing too badly I don't think. Without Massa being forced to gift a win to Alonso, they would both have a win a piece this year and the gap between them would be considerably less. As it is, they are beside each other in the standings.
This years Ferrari is (in my opinion) the second best car out there and on some occassions, has been the class of the field. Massa is highly experienced and Alonso a 2xWDC so why the f*** is McLaren taking the fight to Red Bull and not Ferrari?
Tifosi may be happy with Alonso in the team and that's fine but if I was one, I would be asking what the hell is happening??? I have huge respect for Alonso but he is not getting the results I think he should and is squandering the advantage he has over his lap dog team mate.
You obviously didn't watch 1996 season when Schumacher had the ugly and slow Barnard-car and Newey-designed Williams dominated the year despite having a rookie and a mediocre lead driver. Michael still won 3 races.Quote:
Originally Posted by eu
Yes, I did watch it... it was my first actually and I used to be Hill's fan back then so I don't really agree with your evaluation of him... however you say that Schumi won 3 races that year against 2 mediocre drivers and that is ... huh, amazing?Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
I do not expect him to be a Michael Schumacher. Schumacher was a one-off.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
But also he is not the Kimi Raikkonen of 2008 & 2009.
Thankfully.
The Kimi of 2009 did, if memory serves me, win in the recalcitrant Ferrari. A car, lest we forget, that was born as poor as the '09 McLaren, and the development on which, Ferrari stopped early in order to produce a 'cracker' for this year.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
I might also point out that whilst McLaren hd a poor car at the start of the season, the KERS was pretty handy. The Magnetti Marelli KERS, I hasten to add, tried on several occasions to pan-fry Kimi's cahones & butt cheeks.
Thus far, both car and 'star' driver for 2010 have failed to deliver the promise.
Your memory is incorrect. The Ferrari was the best car at Spa last year. It was not an amazing win.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
You may also like to remember that Kimi was more interested in ice cream than working.
For that alone, Alonso is worth twice as much.
Clutching at straws. Man eats ice cream after car fails.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
How interested would you be if your team was manouvering to buy you out of your contract, and replace you with a blackmailing primadonna?Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Of course, in Kimi's case - he who laughs last........
Yeah, I bet it wasn't even a 99 Flake!Quote:
Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
They might name a corner after him, the one where he spins out again! :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Roamy
Or 'the man who was shown the door by a rookie' Alonso!Quote:
Originally Posted by eu
PS: Getting your seat paid for by a bank doesn't equal being better than the driver who was bought out.
A corner short of a GP circuit IYAM!Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
And why does it matter that I am not on the same page as you?Quote:
Originally Posted by henners88
Who are you to decide what page people should be on?
You and your fellow bullyboys do not have the right to think you are better than anyone.
I have asked you before to show some respect. Apparently that was a waste of time.
Henners me old mucker, I think you were just insulted there.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Did our familiar friend call you a bully?
Thanks for the vid henner. You made my day!
I thought you were a ferrari fan. Obviously you only wish bad to ferrari so you arent a fan.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Don't let them provoke you , Pallone .Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Kimi never had the passion required to be a Ferrari driver .
It was a mis-match , and a mistake from the word go .
And , his ice cream episode showed a driver uninterested in his team , and was a perfect example of why Alonso is infinitely better for the seat .
Remember this is "the Ferrari thread" and these two posters are not Tifosi .
Respect is not why they are here .
Though I cannot call myself Tifoso , I understand .
You are not alone .
I would not call winning the 2007 title for himself and the Scuderia a mistake :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
Kimi does not have the sort of personality that Ferrari love and want their drivers to have, thats true, but it remains that he got the job done and that after all was what he was hired to do in the first place.
I have nothing against Kimi but overall, his 3 years at Ferrari are less then impressive and McLaren is doing much better since he left too. I was delighted when he won the title in 2007 but that was only because McLaren were stupid enough to fight against their better driver... and even in Brasil when it was up to him Massa had to slow down to let him win.
Respect is earned, not given on demand.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
Schumi did better than Alonso with a much worse car, that was my point, which surely an intelligent bloke like you understood.Quote:
Originally Posted by eu
How do you know whether he had passion or not? You judged him based on what you consider to be "passion", what is considered passion in your culture.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagwan
Kimi's problem at Ferrari was cultural, that's pretty evident.
Well, you overestimate me. The circumstances are very diferrent so a comparison based purely on results is too simplistic and it's done only because it suits one's bias IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by DexDexter
Actually, I would stick my neck out and suggest that, on that day, in those conditions, the Force India was the best car. Kimi Won the race by clever timing/use of the KERS.Quote:
Originally Posted by pallone col bracciale
He then, for lap after lap, despite the Force India doing its best impression of 'white van man' on the M25 (right up his a**!), kept Fisi behind him.
Kimi was thought very highly of at McLaren, and I think they certainly got the best out of him - sadly, the McLarens during Kimi's time there were not a match for his talent in terms of reliability.
His wins and recovery drives from the back due to qually engine failures were testament to his quality.