I'm pretty sure he was joking!Quote:
Originally Posted by BleAivano
Printable View
I'm pretty sure he was joking!Quote:
Originally Posted by BleAivano
yes i fed up when somebody asks,and while you answer him he says that my answer is ironic.Are you doing the same?Quote:
Originally Posted by JAM
About the Fords vs Citroens difference due to braking fade is very clear if you watch splits and drivers comments.
At first stage without brake problems they lost more while was bigger and with plenty of junctions.
Except that you think that if Fords had braking problems at a 23 km stage the difference would be 4 and 2,8 seconds from Loeb without problems?
Ok let's just go back to my irony meter remark -I didn't say your post was ironic, the sense of my reply was that you didn't 'detect' that I was being ironic. i.e you were being literal in response to a rhetorical statement. As Back - N -Black correctly thought, I WAS JOKING!!! Now that I have deconstructed the gag I hope we can avoid any more 'flaming' (see what I did there? ;) )Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
http://www.imgdumper.nl/uploads6/503...44-Quattro.jpg
"Quick fuel-stop. Feel like little guy in such a powerfull group B car! Once in a lifetime experience, so damm nice. Stig Blomqvist will drive his original car tomorrow, together with the owner of the car. Just wanted to share this one with you! :-)"
From Kevin Abbring's Facebook page. That is one fine looking piece of machine.
What are you trying to say all the time? That the grass was greener back then? Yes, it was, we all know...Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother John
Was oil flammable in 1970'? Yes, it was even in 1920...
Was brake liquid flammable in 1970'? Yes, it was even in 1920...
Was exhaust hot? Yes, it was even in 1920...
Was debris of tyre/rim able to damage brake liquid pipes? Yes, it was even in 1920...
etc. etc.
Shall we ride horses? But you can fall down and hurt Yourself You know...
Ok ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintexmemory
Thanks "8gear". A very nice looking rally car.
Man, that thing never gets old, I love it.Quote:
Originally Posted by EightGear
Thanks Mirek...nicely put =)Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
I have no doubt about that, is obvious. I only can't understand in wich part of that logic enters the moment when Loeb start looking at the splits.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii