Originally Posted by Mark in Oshawa
NASCAR doesn't have a monopoly on stock car racing, so no one can sue and imply that Mayfield is being persercuted unfairly. If he passed a drug test I am sure ARCA would let him race....
This argument that the drug policy is arbitrary and not public is another red herring. Here's why: NO ONE taking Meth would be legal to drive a race car ANYWHERE on this PLANET. Whether you get caught up in all the BS or not, the reality is NASCAR said Mayfield tested not once but twice for METH. Strip away all the stupidity about Brian France's divorce, and Ramsey Poston's PR statements on how this doesn't change the reality and yes, the reality is Mayfield cannot disprove how he tested not once, but TWICE for Meth. You guys have to quit following the smoke, and stay close the fire. Mayfield's whole defence WAS Clartin gave him the positive test and that there was some mistake. After the circumstances NASCAR had to go by to get that second test, and the fact it was a "witnessed" test following all the protocol issues that were brought up after the first test, he tested positive again with evidence in the sample of Mayfield's massive intake of water trying to flush the drugs from his system. Game...set... Match.....Mayfield's defense is now just trying to distract us...from THAT reality.