Homophobia

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Roamy

Holy Butt Plug - Close this thread

---

So DonKeyote, seems that you should be reprimanded. Oh, and please, if you are unable to direct me to the post and the context with which it was written I would kindly ask that you refrain from your sarcastic comments.
As an aunt of mine in Hull England states," sarcasm is the lowest form of wit".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BDunnell

I happen to find it rather 'personal' to be told I have a 'serious anomaly'.

---

Was it me that stated that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BDunnell

You are not a moderator. The fact that you thought the thread should be closed is completely irrelevant. Surely you must see that?

---

No, I am not a moderator. If you read the post by Roamy and the "like" by DonKeyote then you may direct your angst towards them and not me.

I have been ploite all through this and the only thing you fixate upon is when I was asked to provide a scientific paper which mentions anomaly I am set upon as though I was the person that wrote the paper.
There is selective umbrage by some posters. I have answered every question posed and I am not in any way rude to you. However, I do not see the same with one or two others.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spafranco

Another one picking on one individual to make themselves see in unadulterated unison with some of the other forum members.
Tuskegee Airmen? What in all that is rational have these men got to do with the conversation save for the fact that they were courageous individuals?

You mention studies and medical papers as though they were written by a bunch of uneducated morons not capable of a thought. So with your reasoning you have cast the efforts of Pasteur , Fleming, Bernard, Alzheimer and a myriad of others.
So, in your case you deem it as significant that anything believed in prior to your decided time period is of no significance and everything else is within your frame of time is correct. Slippery slope.

Oh, and by the way, the last of the Tuskegee airmen died.

---

You clearly do not understand the story of the Tuskegee airmen at all. They remained non combatant throughout much of the war - due to a report written by apparently educated scientists.

When they were finally allowed to serve, they proved to be one of the most professional units in the U.S. Army Air Force.

The point is even those that write scientific reports are not free of their own bigotry and this becomes clearer the further you go back in time.

If you don't get the point, not much point explaining it. Though I rather think you just posted links to random articles and papers that happened to contain words such as 'abnormal' or 'condition' from the web to prove a point. I doubt if any gay person regards themselves or their lives as a mishap, even if you think of it that way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sprocket

You clearly do not understand the story of the Tuskegee airmen at all. They remained non combatant throughout much of the war - due to a report written by apparently educated scientists.

When they were finally allowed to serve, they proved to be one of the most professional units in the U.S. Army Air Force.

The point is even those that write scientific reports are not free of their own bigotry and this becomes clearer the further you go back in time.

If you don't get the point, not much point explaining it. Though I rather think you just posted links to random articles and papers that happened to contain words such as 'abnormal' or 'condition' from the web to prove a point. I doubt if any gay person regards themselves or their lives as a mishap, even if you think of it that way.

---

First of all I am well informed as to who the Tuskegee airmen were. How you deemed that I do not, based upon a question and pointing out the fact that the last of these brave men died is rather ambitious of you.

Secondly, you have your opinion but you do not have the right to make character assassination judgements.

It seems as though you and a couple of others have one goal and that is to create an argument. Don't read my posts. Simple as that.

If you knew how carefully the language used in medical studies you would not make idiotic statements such as the one above.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BDunnell

Why? Why does it matter?

---

If you as a gay man do not see how serious this whole topic is then you do not live in the US. Here it is important enough to win or lose elections based upon the stance of the party.
Just yesterday a member of the government, a republican and a vociferous campaigner against gay marriage and gays in the military.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spafranco

Oh, and please, if you are unable to direct me to the post and the context with which it was written I would kindly ask that you refrain from your sarcastic comments.

---

what part of 221 in

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by donKey jote

lost the search button? It's hard to tell which of your posts you mean, as you appear to have mangled the quotes :)

... 221 was an example of you being avidly aggressive, no matter what the context was :)

---

don't you understand?

whatever :dozey:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spafranco

Secondly, you have your opinion but you do not have the right to make character assassination judgements.

It seems as though you and a couple of others have one goal and that is to create an argument. Don't read my posts. Simple as that.

If you knew how carefully the language used in medical studies you would not make idiotic statements such as the one above.

---

You know the saying... argue with a donkey and onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.

If I didn't feel like I was in a time-warp I'd say "welcome back loowi" and congratulate you on beating your previous post tally :wave:


whatever :dozey:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spafranco

when I was asked to provide a scientific paper which mentions anomaly I am set upon

---

if anything, you were asked to provide a scientific paper mentioning very serious anomaly or mishap.

very serious / mishap

Whatever... no point going around and around in circles.

I've tried twice now to read the last few pages of this thread, but I can't! :erm: It's so uninteresting. :erm:

Could someone give me the gist, in 100 characters or fewer? :D

Some tit-for-tat affair, is it? :)