hmmmm....why ? Norway and Sweden showed otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Finni
Printable View
hmmmm....why ? Norway and Sweden showed otherwise.Quote:
Originally Posted by Finni
Not very long!Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
I would like time penality but ensure that I have a reliable car in the following event. According to Mills, at the end of the stage there were no more oil in the engine, don't you think that this can affect the engine and loose power in the next event?Quote:
Originally Posted by SUBARUNORWAY1
Hirvonen now 2nd !!!! 1 second infront of Atko.
As expected...Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
Loeb dominates.....he makes other rally drivers look like sick dogs waiting for someone to put them out of their misery
They use the car back in Argentina! Look at Stohl´s car, It is 6 years old!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by White Sauron
But they can change the engine betwene the events without penalty now that they retiredQuote:
Originally Posted by WRC2006
radio reports an oil leak from loebs car....also from Hirvonens car...
Say what you say and what you want but to me it seems that Xsara was about as fast as Focus - watch for instance Stohl's astonishing raw stage win in repeated stage.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
We know that Sordo had particular problems with the snow. And I can buy that Focus was clearly better in Norway with particular conditions. But yesterday Sordo's pace in repeated stages was astonishing. He is not yet as fast as Petter and shouldn't be anywhere near to Hirvonen.